Literature DB >> 8419503

Effectiveness of an ethics consultation service.

R D Orr1, E Moon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ethics consultation is a relatively new service in clinical medicine. Most such services have been developed in departments of internal medicine. Few studies have evaluated the results of such consultations, and none have examined whether a family practice perspective enhances the consultation process.
METHODS: An ethics consultation service was established in the Department of Family Medicine at Loma Linda University School of Medicine in 1990. Data were collected from the consultations performed during the first year. A questionnaire was sent to the attending physicians for their evaluation of the service.
RESULTS: Ethics consultations were provided to the health care teams of 46 patients in five clinical departments. The attending physicians found the consultations to be important in clarifying ethical issues, educating the team, increasing confidence in decisions, and in patient management in more than 90% of the cases; however, the consultations resulted in significant changes in patient management only 36% of the time.
CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to establish an ethics consultation service within a department of family medicine in a university hospital and to provide consultations to physicians in other specialties.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Loma Linda University Medical Center

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8419503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  18 in total

1.  Pilgrimage and profession.

Authors:  Robert D Orr
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2003-12

2.  Clinical consulting: the search for resolution at the intersection of medicine, law, and ethics.

Authors:  Linda Farber Post
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2003-12

3.  Why doctors use or do not use ethics consultation.

Authors:  J P Orlowski; S Hein; J A Christensen; R Meinke; T Sincich
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Project examining effectiveness in clinical ethics (PEECE): phase 1-- descriptive analysis of nine clinical ethics services.

Authors:  M D Godkin; K Faith; R E G Upshur; S K Macrae; C S Tracy
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Ethical difficulties in clinical practice: experiences of European doctors.

Authors:  S A Hurst; A Perrier; R Pegoraro; S Reiter-Theil; R Forde; A-M Slowther; E Garrett-Mayer; M Danis
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Physicians' access to ethics support services in four European countries.

Authors:  Samia A Hurst; Stella Reiter-Theil; Arnaud Perrier; Reidun Forde; Anne-Marie Slowther; Renzo Pegoraro; Marion Danis
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-12

7.  Mandatory ethics consultation policy.

Authors:  Megan E Romano; Staffan B Wahlander; Barbara H Lang; Guohua Li; Kenneth M Prager
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Ethics consultation at a large urban public teaching hospital.

Authors:  Elliot B Tapper; Christian J Vercler; Deborah Cruze; William Sexson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  How physicians face ethical difficulties: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  S A Hurst; S C Hull; G DuVal; M Danis
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  A national survey of U.S. internists' experiences with ethical dilemmas and ethics consultation.

Authors:  Gordon DuVal; Brian Clarridge; Gary Gensler; Marion Danis
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.