Literature DB >> 8419024

Significance of smoking in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Experience gleaned from the International Tissue Plasminogen Activator/Streptokinase Mortality Trial.

G I Barbash1, H D White, M Modan, R Diaz, J R Hampton, J Heikkila, A Kristinsson, S Moulopoulos, E A Paolasso, T Van der Werf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that smoking is a well-established risk factor for the development of coronary artery disease, some investigators have noted that hospital mortality after acute myocardial infarction is lower in patients who smoke than in nonsmoking patients. To evaluate the association of smoking with mortality during hospitalization after thrombolytic therapy and 6 months afterward, we analyzed the results of the International Tissue Plasminogen Activator/Streptokinase Mortality Trial. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients were divided into three groups: nonsmokers (those who never smoked), ex-smokers, and active smokers. Multivariate and univariate comparisons were made with respect to baseline characteristics and clinical outcome. There were 2,366 nonsmokers, 2,244 ex-smokers, and 3,649 active smokers. The baseline characteristics of nonsmoking patients differed significantly from the ex-smokers and active smokers. The nonsmoking group included more women than the ex-smokers or active smokers (45% versus 10.6% and 17.6%, respectively), was older (67 +/- 10 years versus 64 +/- 10 years and 58 +/- 11 years), had a higher rate of diabetes mellitus (16.3% versus 11.1% and 7.5%), and had a worse Killip class at admission. Nonsmoking patients and ex-smokers experienced more in-hospital reinfarction than active smokers (4.7% and 5% versus 2.7%, p < 0.0001, respectively). Nonsmokers experienced more in-hospital shock than the ex-smokers or active smokers (9.2% versus 6.4% and 5.8%, p < 0.0001), stroke (1.9% versus 1.8% and 0.8%, p < 0.0001), and bleeding (7.2% versus 6.5% and 4.4%, p < 0.0001). They also experienced a higher in-hospital and 6-month mortality (12.8% and 17.6%) than ex-smokers (8.2% and 12.1%) or active smokers (5.4% and 7.8%) (p < 0.0001). A multivariate analysis accounting for all baseline characteristics demonstrated a significant association between nonsmoking and increased hospital mortality, with an odds ratio of 1.42 (confidence limits, 1.15-1.72). Among active smokers, there was a nonsignificant trend for mortality rates to decrease with increasing numbers of cigarettes smoked per day.
CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis indicates that smokers receiving thrombolytic therapy after acute myocardial infarction have significantly better hospital and 6-month outcome than nonsmokers or ex-smokers. However, smokers sustained their infarction at a significantly earlier age than nonsmokers, and strenuous efforts should continue to be made to decrease the incidence of new and continued smoking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8419024     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.87.1.53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  32 in total

1.  Evaluation of serial QT dispersion in patients with first non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: relation to the severity of underlying coronary artery disease.

Authors:  T G Lyras; V A Papapanagiotou; M G Foukarakis; F K Panou; N D Skampas; J A Lakoumentas; C V Priftis; A A Zacharoulis
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  The smoker's paradox and the real risk of smoking.

Authors:  Friedebert Kunz; Christoph Pechlaner; Helmut Hörtnagl; Rudolf Pfister
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Hypercholesterolaemia and lipid lowering treatment do not affect the acute endogenous fibrinolytic capacity in vivo.

Authors:  D E Newby; F N Witherow; R A Wright; P Bloomfield; C A Ludlam; N A Boon; K A A Fox; D J Webb
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  The biology behind the atherothrombotic effects of cigarette smoke.

Authors:  Adam Csordas; David Bernhard
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Acute (but not chronic) smoking paradoxically protects the endothelium from ischemia and reperfusion: insight into the "smoking paradox".

Authors:  Monica Lisi; Saverio Dragoni; Maria Cristina Leone; Thomas Münzel; John D Parker; Tommaso Gori
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 6.  Atherosclerosis, cigarette smoking, and endogenous fibrinolysis: is there a direct link?

Authors:  Stanley Chia; David E Newby
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.113

7.  Cardiovascular risk factors and clinical presentation in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  A Rosengren; L Wallentin; M Simoons; A K Gitt; S Behar; A Battler; D Hasdai
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Current smoking and the risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction in the WHO MONICA Project populations.

Authors:  M S Mähönen; P McElduff; A J Dobson; K A Kuulasmaa; A E Evans
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Smoking, clopidogrel, and mortality in patients with established cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Berger; Deepak L Bhatt; Steven R Steinhubl; Mingyuan Shao; P Gabriel Steg; Gilles Montalescot; Werner Hacke; Keith A Fox; A Michael Lincoff; Eric J Topol; Peter B Berger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  The smoker's paradox after successful fibrinolysis: reduced risk of reocclusion but no improved long-term cardiac outcome.

Authors:  Peter C Kievit; Marc A Brouwer; Gerrit Veen; Wim R M Aengevaeren; Freek W A Verheugt
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.