Literature DB >> 8417607

Demographic predictors of mammography and Pap smear screening in US women.

E E Calle1, W D Flanders, M J Thun, L M Martin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Proven screening technologies exist for both breast and cervical cancer, but they are underused by many women. We sought to evaluate the effect of demographic characteristics on the underuse of mammography and Pap smear screening.
METHODS: We analyzed responses from 12,252 women who participated in the 1987 National Health Interview Survey Cancer Control Supplement. Demographic profiles were produced to target severely underserved groups of women.
RESULTS: Low income was a strong predictor of mammography underuse, as was Hispanic ethnicity and other race, low educational attainment, age greater than 65, and residence in a rural area. A strong predictor of never having had a Pap smear was never having been married; however, the importance of this characteristic is difficult to interpret in the absence of data on sexual activity. Hispanic women and women of other races of all ages and all income levels underused Pap smear screening, as did older women, particularly older Black women.
CONCLUSIONS: The tendency of women to underuse screening technologies varies greatly across levels of basic demographic characteristics. The importance of these characteristics differs for mammography screening versus Pap smear screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8417607      PMCID: PMC1694510          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.83.1.53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  20 in total

1.  Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer? Results from a new national survey.

Authors:  R A Hayward; M F Shapiro; H E Freeman; C R Corey
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-05

2.  Recency of Pap smear screening: a multivariate model.

Authors:  H L Howe; H Bzduch
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1987 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  National estimates of teenage sexual activity: evaluating the comparability of three national surveys.

Authors:  J R Kahn; W D Kalsbeek; S L Hofferth
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1988-05

4.  Correlates of cervical cytologic screening.

Authors:  W H Chow; R S Greenberg; J M Liff
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 0.954

Review 5.  Epidemiology of uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  L A Brinton; J F Fraumeni
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

6.  National trends in the use of preventive health care by women.

Authors:  D M Makuc; V M Freid; J C Kleinman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Breast cancer screening by mammography: utilization and associated factors.

Authors:  J G Zapka; A M Stoddard; M E Costanza; H L Greene
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Does screening by "Pap" smears help prevent cervical cancer? A case-control study.

Authors:  E A Clarke; T W Anderson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-07-07       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  The value of a Pap smear program and suggestions for its implementation.

Authors:  D A Boyes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  D M Eddy
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  98 in total

1.  The role of cultural variables in breast self-examination and cervical cancer screening behavior in young Asian women living in the United States.

Authors:  T S Tang; L J Solomon; C J Yeh; J K Worden
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1999-10

2.  Predictors of mammography use among Canadian women aged 50-69: findings from the 1996/97 National Population Health Survey.

Authors:  C J Maxwell; C M Bancej; J Snider
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and physician recommendation for mammography: who gets the message about breast cancer screening?

Authors:  M S O'Malley; J A Earp; S T Hawley; M J Schell; H F Mathews; J Mitchell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Increasing use of mammography among older, rural African American women: results from a community trial.

Authors:  Jo Anne Earp; Eugenia Eng; Michael S O'Malley; Mary Altpeter; Garth Rauscher; Linda Mayne; Holly F Mathews; Kathy S Lynch; Bahjat Qaqish
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Factors important in promoting cervical cancer screening among Canadian women: findings from the 1996-97 National Population Health Survey (NPHS).

Authors:  C J Maxwell; C M Bancej; J Snider; S A Vik
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

6.  Breast cancer knowledge and early detection among Hispanic women with a family history of breast cancer along the U.S.-Mexico border.

Authors:  Yelena Bird; John Moraros; Matthew P Banegas; Sasha King; Surasri Prapasiri; Beti Thompson
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2010-05

7.  Racial/ethnic differences in the self-reported use of screening mammography.

Authors:  Alma R Jones; Lee S Caplan; Mary Kidd Davis
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2003-10

8.  Breast and cervical cancer screening among Latinas and non-Latina whites.

Authors:  Ana F Abraído-Lanza; Maria T Chao; Marilie D Gammon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  The role of social capital in African-American women's use of mammography.

Authors:  Lorraine Dean; S V Subramanian; David R Williams; Katrina Armstrong; Camille Zubrinsky Charles; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Mortality from breast carcinoma among US women: the role and implications of socio-economics, heterogeneous insurance, screening mammography, and geography.

Authors:  Albert A Okunade; Mustafa C Karakus
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2003-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.