Literature DB >> 8416595

Impact of patient-controlled compression on the mammography experience.

P J Kornguth1, B K Rimer, M R Conaway, D C Sullivan, K E Catoe, A L Stout, J S Brackett.   

Abstract

The authors tested the hypothesis that giving women control over the compression portion of the mammography examination results in a less painful experience, greater overall patient satisfaction, and a radiographic image as good as that produced by means of technologist-controlled compression. One hundred nine women undergoing screening mammography at a hospital-based outpatient clinic were studied. Each underwent two-view, screen-film mammography performed in routine fashion except that, by random assignment, one breast was compressed by the technologist and the other breast, by the patient. Patient-controlled compression was significantly (P = .003) less painful than technologist-controlled compression. Overall patient satisfaction (96% [105 of 109]) and willingness to repeat the experience were extremely high. The majority of images (93.5% [202 of 216]) were rated as having good to excellent compression. With minimal patient education, self-compression resulted in an image at least as good as that produced with technologist-applied compression. Further study of this technique is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8416595     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.186.1.8416595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  12 in total

1.  Self-compression Technique vs Standard Compression in Mammography: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Philippe Henrot; Martine Boisserie-Lacroix; Véronique Boute; Philippe Troufléau; Bruno Boyer; Grégory Lesanne; Véronique Gillon; Emmanuel Desandes; Edith Netter; Maryam Saadate; Anne Tardivon; Christine Grentzinger; Julia Salleron; Guillaume Oldrini
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Mammography: influence of departmental practice and women's characteristics on patient satisfaction: comparison of six departments in Norway.

Authors:  K Løken; S Steine; E Laerum
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-09

3.  Pain and discomfort associated with mammography among urban low-income African-American women.

Authors:  Mia A Papas; Ann C Klassen
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2005-08

4.  Comparison of technical parameters and women's experience between self-compression and standard compression modes in mammography screening: a single-blind randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Natalia Arenas; Rodrigo Alcantara; Margarita Posso; Javier Louro; Daniela Perez-Leon; Belén Ejarque; Mónica Arranz; Jose Maiques; Xavier Castells; Francesc Macià; Marta Román; Ana Rodríguez-Arana
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Factors associated with annual-interval mammography for women in their 40s.

Authors:  Jennifer M Gierisch; Suzanne C O'Neill; Barbara K Rimer; Jessica T DeFrank; J Michael Bowling; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Influence of the radiographer on the pain felt during mammography.

Authors:  M Van Goethem; D Mortelmans; E Bruyninckx; I Verslegers; I Biltjes; E Van Hove; A De Schepper
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Assessment of mammography experiences and satisfaction among American Indian/Alaska Native women.

Authors:  Florence M Ndikum-Moffor; Stacy Braiuca; Christine Makosky Daley; Byron J Gajewski; Kimberly K Engelman
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec

8.  An assessment of American Indian women's mammography experiences.

Authors:  Kimberly K Engelman; Christine M Daley; Byron J Gajewski; Florence Ndikum-Moffor; Babalola Faseru; Stacy Braiuca; Stephanie Joseph; Edward F Ellerbeck; K Allen Greiner
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  A New Technical Mode in Mammography: Self-Compression Improves Satisfaction.

Authors:  Sıla Ulus; Özge Kovan; Aydan Arslan; Pınar Elpen; Erkin Arıbal
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2019-06-17

Review 10.  Interventions for relieving the pain and discomfort of screening mammography.

Authors:  D Miller; V Livingstone; P Herbison
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.