Literature DB >> 24183414

Assessment of mammography experiences and satisfaction among American Indian/Alaska Native women.

Florence M Ndikum-Moffor1, Stacy Braiuca, Christine Makosky Daley, Byron J Gajewski, Kimberly K Engelman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women have lower breast cancer (BCA) screening and 5-year survival rates than non-Hispanic Whites. Understanding reasons for low screening rates is important to combatting later stage diagnoses. The purpose of this study was to assess mammography experiences and satisfaction among AI/AN women.
METHODS: Nine focus groups were held with rural (N = 15) and urban (N = 38) AI/AN women 40 years and older in Kansas and Kansas City, Missouri, living both near and far from Indian Health Service (IHS) and tribal facilities, to examine experiences and satisfaction with mammography. Transcripts were coded and themes identified using a community-based participatory research approach.
FINDINGS: Themes were classified under knowledge, communication, and awareness of BCA; barriers to mammography; mammogram facility size; impressions of mammogram technologist; motivations for getting a mammogram; and how to improve the mammogram experience. Participants had knowledge of prevention, but described cultural reasons for not discussing it and described better experiences in smaller facilities. Participants indicated having a mammogram technologist who was friendly, knowledgeable, respectful, competent, and explained the test was a determining factor in satisfaction. Other factors included family history, physician recommendation, and financial incentives. Barriers included transportation, cost, perceptions of prejudice, and time constraints. Participants on reservations or near IHS facilities preferred IHS over mainstream providers. Suggestions for improvement included caring technologists, better machines with less discomfort, and education.
CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to enhance the professionalism, empathy, and cultural awareness of mammogram technologists; reduce barriers; and provide positive expectations and incentives could improve satisfaction and compliance with screening mammography. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24183414      PMCID: PMC3885991          DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2013.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Issues        ISSN: 1049-3867


  24 in total

1.  Discomfort and pain during mammography: description, prediction, and prevention.

Authors:  D R Rutter; M Calnan; M S Vaile; S Field; K A Wade
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-08-22

2.  Behavioral consequences of consumer dissatisfaction with medical care.

Authors:  J E Ware; A R Davies
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  1983

3.  Development and validation of the EBS: a measure to assess women's experience at all stages of the breast screening process.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Joan Austoker
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.341

4.  Mammography adherence: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Lisa C Watson-Johnson; Amy DeGroff; C Brooke Steele; Michelle Revels; Judith Lee Smith; Erin Justen; Rachel Barron-Simpson; Latasha Sanders; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Perceptions of the screening mammography experience by Hispanic and non-Hispanic White women.

Authors:  Kimberly K Engelman; Amy M Cizik; Edward F Ellerbeck; Veronica F Rempusheski
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2012-06-01

6.  Breast cancer and screening in American Indian and Alaska Native women.

Authors:  Marilyn A Roubidoux
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Patients' preferences for learning the results of mammographic examinations.

Authors:  S E Lind; D Kopans; M J Good
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Trends in area-socioeconomic and race-ethnic disparities in breast cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis, screening, mortality, and survival among women ages 50 years and over (1987-2005).

Authors:  Sam Harper; John Lynch; Stephen C Meersman; Nancy Breen; William W Davis; Marsha C Reichman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Breast cancer incidence among American Indian and Alaska Native women: US, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Phyllis A Wingo; Jessica King; Judith Swan; Steven S Coughlin; Judith S Kaur; Julie A Erb-Alvarez; Jeannette Jackson-Thompson; Teshia G Arambula Solomon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Development and validation of an instrument to measure satisfaction of participants at breast screening programmes.

Authors:  J Cockburn; D Hill; L Irwig; T De Luise; D Turnbull; P Schofield
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 9.162

View more
  6 in total

1.  The influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists' ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practice.

Authors:  Louise M Henderson; Thad Benefield; Mary W Marsh; Bruce F Schroeder; Danielle D Durham; Bonnie C Yankaskas; J Michael Bowling
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Bayesian Hierarchical Factor Analysis for Efficient Estimation across Race/Ethnicity.

Authors:  Jinxiang Hu; Lauren Clark; Peng Shi; Vincent S Staggs; Christine Daley; Byron Gajewski
Journal:  Rev Colomb Estad       Date:  2021-07-12

3.  Breast cancer literacy and health beliefs related to breast cancer screening among American Indian women.

Authors:  Soonhee Roh; Catherine E Burnette; Yeon-Shim Lee; Jung Sim Jun; Hee Yun Lee; Kyoung Hag Lee
Journal:  Soc Work Health Care       Date:  2018-03-28

4.  Influence of Discomfort Tolerance of Women who Undergo Mammography on the Perceived Pain Intensity Due to the Procedure.

Authors:  Neriman Akansel; Muaz Gülşen; Muhammed Gültaş
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2020-12-24

5.  Quantification of Potential Inequities in Breast Cancer Incidence in New Mexico Through Bayesian Disease Mapping.

Authors:  David Zahrieh; Michael A Golafshar; Samir H Patel; Todd A DeWees
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Regular Mammography Screening Among African American (AA) Women: Qualitative Application of the PEN-3 Framework.

Authors:  Adebola Adegboyega; Adaeze Aroh; Kaitlin Voigts; Hatcher Jennifer
Journal:  J Transcult Nurs       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 1.869

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.