Literature DB >> 8416407

Disease-specific survival following routine prostate cancer screening by digital rectal examination.

G S Gerber1, I M Thompson, R Thisted, G W Chodak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess prostate cancer mortality in men undergoing routine screening by routine digital rectal examination.
DESIGN: Cohort study with a median follow-up period of 75 months.
SETTING: Population consisted of volunteers at a university clinic and men in an institutional health maintenance clinic. PATIENTS: Fifty-six men with a mean age of 65 years (range, 52 to 79 years) diagnosed with prostate cancer.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients treated initially by observation, external or interstitial radiotherapy, radical prostatectomy, hormone therapy, or combination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to local progression, distant metastases, death from all causes, and death from prostate cancer. Mantel-Haenszel log-rank statistic was used to compare outcome in men diagnosed on initial examination with those diagnosed on subsequent examinations.
RESULTS: Clinically localized prostate cancer was diagnosed in 73% during an initial examination and 83% on subsequent examinations and (P.35). Grade distribution of tumors was similar in both groups. Overall 5 and 10 year survival of all cancer patients was 85% and 67%, respectively. Death from prostate cancer was 8% (3/38) in men diagnosed on initial examination and 33% (6/18) during subsequent examinations. Five- and 10-year disease-specific survival was 97% and 86%, respectively, for men diagnosed during the first rectal examination compared with only 81% and 57%, respectively, for men diagnosed on subsequent rectal examinations (P = .02).
CONCLUSION: Routine screening for prostate cancer by annual digital rectal examination alone may be insufficiently frequent and/or sensitive to prevent significant mortality from this disease [corrected].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8416407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  6 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer, screening, and prostate-specific antigen: promise or peril?

Authors:  J D Voss
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Migration and prostate cancer: an international perspective.

Authors:  F F Angwafo
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Prostate cancer screening (United States).

Authors:  J W Waterbor; A J Bueschen
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography: a meta-analysis for this diagnostic triad of prostate cancer in symptomatic korean men.

Authors:  Jae Mann Song; Chun Bae Kim; Hyun Chul Chung; Robert L Kane
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 5.  Screening for ovarian, prostatic, and testicular cancers.

Authors:  J Austoker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-07-30

6.  Toward a better understanding of the comparatively high prostate cancer incidence rates in Utah.

Authors:  Ray M Merrill; Sterling C Hilton; Charles L Wiggins; Jared D Sturgeon
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 4.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.