Literature DB >> 8414888

Variability of olfactory threshold and its role in assessment of aging.

J C Stevens1, A D Dadarwala.   

Abstract

Olfactory thresholds of elderly persons (over 65 years) average one to two orders of magnitude higher than those of young adults (under 30 years). Past studies reveal enormous spreads (typically about three orders of magnitude) of individual thresholds within each age group and extensive overlap between the two groups--enough to question how typically decline in sensitivity characterizes the individual aged person. The present study shows that much of the observed overlap is misleading, because the brief threshold tests usually administered tend to exaggerate individual differences. A more representative assessment of an individual's threshold (for 1-butanol) was achieved by averaging the thresholds from two to eight separate short tests, spread over 4 days. The spread of each group's thresholds (12 young and 12 elderly subjects) narrowed strikingly as the number of tests averaged increased from one to four; further tests accomplished no additional narrowing of spread. Based on a single test, thresholds of young and elderly overlapped in the usual way; but based on four or more tests, thresholds of young and elderly overlapped little or not at all. The outcome (1) argues that decline in smell sensitivity seems to be, after all, a common feature of aging, and (2) sheds light on the sources of variability of sensory thresholds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8414888     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  18 in total

1.  An analysis of individual differences in olfactory thresholds.

Authors:  F N JONES
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1957-06

2.  Olfactory sensitivity: reliability, generality, and association with aging.

Authors:  W S Cain; J F Gent
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Life-span development of odor identification, learning, and olfactory sensitivity.

Authors:  W S Cain; J C Stevens; C M Nickou; A Giles; I Johnston; M R Garcia-Medina
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  The step method: a new adaptive psychophysical procedure.

Authors:  W A Simpson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-06

5.  Olfactory adaptation and recovery in old age.

Authors:  J C Stevens; W S Cain; F T Schiet; M W Oatley
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Old-age deficits in the sense of smell as gauged by thresholds, magnitude matching, and odor identification.

Authors:  J C Stevens; W S Cain
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1987-03

7.  Smelling via the mouth: effect of aging.

Authors:  J C Stevens; W S Cain
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-09

8.  Determinants of measured olfactory sensitivity.

Authors:  M D Rabin; W S Cain
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-04

9.  The distribution of the sensitivity to chemical odors in man.

Authors:  K S Brown; C M Maclean; R R Robinette
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 0.553

10.  The relationship of olfactory receptor stimulation to stimulus-environmental temperature.

Authors:  J L Grundvig; R E Dustman; E C Beck
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 5.330

View more
  8 in total

1.  Impaired olfactory discrimination learning and decreased olfactory sensitivity in aged C57Bl/6 mice.

Authors:  Roseanne C Patel; John Larson
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 4.673

2.  General olfactory sensitivity database (GOSdb): candidate genes and their genomic variations.

Authors:  Ifat Keydar; Edna Ben-Asher; Ester Feldmesser; Noam Nativ; Arisa Oshimoto; Diego Restrepo; Hiroaki Matsunami; Ming-Shan Chien; Jayant M Pinto; Yoav Gilad; Tsviya Olender; Doron Lancet
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.878

3.  Odor detection thresholds in a population of older adults.

Authors:  Carla R Schubert; Mary E Fischer; A Alex Pinto; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Karen J Cruickshanks
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Age effect on olfactory discrimination in a non-human primate, Microcebus murinus.

Authors:  Marine Joly; Bertrand Deputte; Jean-Michel Verdier
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Analysis of user characteristics related to drop-off detection with long cane.

Authors:  Dae Shik Kim; Robert Wall Emerson; Amy Curtis
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2010

6.  Olfactory psychometric functions for homologous 2-ketones.

Authors:  J Enrique Cometto-Muñiz; Michael H Abraham
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Aging and the (Chemical) Senses: Implications for Food Behaviour Amongst Elderly Consumers.

Authors:  Charles Spence; Jozef Youssef
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-01-15

8.  Olfactory phenotypic expression unveils human aging.

Authors:  Andrea Mazzatenta; Alessandro Cellerino; Nicola Origlia; Davide Barloscio; Ferdinando Sartucci; Camillo Di Giulio; Luciano Domenici
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-04-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.