Literature DB >> 1830082

Olfactory sensitivity: reliability, generality, and association with aging.

W S Cain1, J F Gent.   

Abstract

Thirty-two Ss between 22 and 59 years of age yielded detection thresholds for 4 odorants over 4 sessions. The thresholds decreased and reliability increased over the course of testing. High intercorrelations between odorants and the stability of an S's relative position within the threshold distributions showed that a general factor of sensitivity dominated the outcome. Age contributed strongly to intersubject variation. Even among these nonelderly individuals, it accounted for up to 2 orders of magnitude in threshold performance. Other important factors included superiority of the right nostril and a negative correlation between the mean and variance of threshold distributions. Scant attention to the correlation may have contributed to overestimation of the frequency and specificity of specific anosmia. A clinically relevant outcome was that measurement of threshold for diagnostic purposes can generally rely on just 1 odorant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1830082     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.17.2.382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  27 in total

1.  Both odor identification and ApoE-ε4 contribute to normative cognitive aging.

Authors:  Deborah Finkel; Chandra A Reynolds; Maria Larsson; Margaret Gatz; Nancy L Pedersen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-04-25

2.  Recollective experience in odor recognition: influences of adult age and familiarity.

Authors:  Maria Larsson; Christina Oberg; Lars Bäckman
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-10-06

Review 3.  Olfactory dysfunction and its measurement in the clinic and workplace.

Authors:  Richard L Doty
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Odor frequency and odor annoyance. Part I: assessment of frequency, intensity and hedonic tone of environmental odors in the field.

Authors:  Kirsten Sucker; Ralf Both; Michael Bischoff; Rainer Guski; Gerhard Winneke
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  General olfactory sensitivity database (GOSdb): candidate genes and their genomic variations.

Authors:  Ifat Keydar; Edna Ben-Asher; Ester Feldmesser; Noam Nativ; Arisa Oshimoto; Diego Restrepo; Hiroaki Matsunami; Ming-Shan Chien; Jayant M Pinto; Yoav Gilad; Tsviya Olender; Doron Lancet
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.878

6.  The effect of nasal structure on olfactory function in patients with OSA.

Authors:  Dan Fu; Jayant M Pinto; Li Wang; Guowei Chen; Xiaojun Zhan; Yongxiang Wei
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Perception of specific trigeminal chemosensory agonists.

Authors:  J Frasnelli; J Albrecht; B Bryant; J N Lundström
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Odor detection thresholds in a population of older adults.

Authors:  Carla R Schubert; Mary E Fischer; A Alex Pinto; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Karen J Cruickshanks
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Episodic memory of odors stratifies Alzheimer biomarkers in normal elderly.

Authors:  Alefiya Dhilla Albers; Josephine Asafu-Adjei; Mary K Delaney; Kathleen E Kelly; Teresa Gomez-Isla; Deborah Blacker; Keith A Johnson; Reisa A Sperling; Bradley T Hyman; Rebecca A Betensky; Lloyd Hastings; Mark W Albers
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 10.  Human olfaction: a constant state of change-blindness.

Authors:  Lee Sela; Noam Sobel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.