Literature DB >> 8413028

Beam quality specification for photon beam dosimetry.

A Kosunen1, D W Rogers.   

Abstract

It is argued that %dd(10), the percentage depth dose at 10 cm in a 10 x 10 cm2 photon beam at a SSD of 100 cm, is a better beam quality specifier for radiotherapy beams than the commonly used values of TPR10(20) or nominal accelerating potential (NAP). For radiation dosimetry purposes, TPR10(20) is not an ideal beam quality specifier because (i) stopping-power ratios for the same value of TPR10(20) can vary by up to 0.7% for thick-target bremsstrahlung beams; (ii) the value of TPR10(20) becomes insensitive to beam quality changes for high-energy beams; and (iii) it has little intuitive meaning. In contrast, %dd(10) in a pure photon beam specifies stopping-power ratios within 0.2% for all thick-target bremsstrahlung beams, maintains its sensitivity for high-energy beams, and has a simple physical and clinical meaning. It is shown that for all thick-target bremsstrahlung beams the spr (water/air) = 1.2676-0.002 224[%dd(10)] with a rms deviation of 0.1%. The effects of electron contamination in typical high-energy clinical beams can be corrected for using previously published experimental results or by reducing electron contamination using lead scattering foils.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8413028     DOI: 10.1118/1.597150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

1.  Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon beams.

Authors:  Malcolm McEwen; Larry DeWerd; Geoffrey Ibbott; David Followill; David W O Rogers; Stephen Seltzer; Jan Seuntjens
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Beam data modeling of linear accelerators (linacs) through machine learning and its potential applications in fast and robust linac commissioning and quality assurance.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Ishan Patil; Bin Han; Yong Yang; Lei Xing; Emil Schüler
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Comparison of AAPM Addendum to TG-51, IAEA TRS-398, and JSMP 12: Calibration of photon beams in water.

Authors:  Naoki Kinoshita; Hiroshi Oguchi; Yasuhiro Nishimoto; Toshiki Adachi; Hiroki Shioura; Hirohiko Kimura; Kunio Doi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 4.  Monte Carlo simulations in radiotherapy dosimetry.

Authors:  Pedro Andreo
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Comparison of IPSM 1990 photon dosimetry code of practice with IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51.

Authors:  Silvia Vargas Castrillón; Francisco Cutanda Henríquez
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.