Literature DB >> 8412094

Stress distributions in vascular aneurysms: factors affecting risk of aneurysm rupture.

W R Mower1, L J Baraff, J Sneyd.   

Abstract

Aneurysm rupture occurs when local wall stresses exceed the tensile strength of vascular tissues. Knowledge of vascular wall stresses, and insight into the factors that change wall stresses, will lead to a better understanding of how aneurysms grow and rupture. In this study, stress distributions in the walls of small aneurysms were calculated using finite element analysis (FEA), a numerical technique able to predict stress distributions with greater accuracy than the Law of Laplace. Stresses were calculated for an initial small aneurysm and compared to stresses produced by increasing the aneurysm diameter, decreasing the wall thickness, and changing the material properties of the aneurysm wall. FEA calculations indicate that wall stresses are generally greatest on the inner surface of an aneurysm, and decrease nonlinearly as the outer wall is approached. Maximum wall stresses occur along the region of greatest diameter, and circumferential stresses tend to be significantly greater than longitudinal stresses. Doubling the diameter of an aneurysm produced a twofold increase in the maximum wall stress. Decreasing the wall thickness by half also produced a doubling of the maximum wall stress. Changing material properties produced no appreciable change in wall stresses. However, weaker materials fail at lower stresses, thus halving material strength would be equivalent to doubling wall stresses. We conclude that the Law of Laplace is inaccurate in predicting the complicated stress distributions that exist in aneurysm walls, and that more sophisticated tools, such as FEA, will be needed to understand this complex phenomenon. We also conclude that proportional changes in the diameter, wall thickness, or aneurysm tissue strength have roughly equivalent effects on aneurysm growth and rupture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8412094     DOI: 10.1006/jsre.1993.1123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  14 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm geometry.

Authors:  Judy Shum; Giampaolo Martufi; Elena Di Martino; Christopher B Washington; Joseph Grisafi; Satish C Muluk; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 2.  Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  David A Vorp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  A Comparative Classification Analysis of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms by Machine Learning Algorithms.

Authors:  Balaji Rengarajan; Wei Wu; Crystal Wiedner; Daijin Ko; Satish C Muluk; Mark K Eskandari; Prahlad G Menon; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  The Association Between Geometry and Wall Stress in Emergently Repaired Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Sathyajeeth S Chauhan; Carlos A Gutierrez; Mirunalini Thirugnanasambandam; Victor De Oliveira; Satish C Muluk; Mark K Eskandari; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Decision Tree Based Classification of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using Geometry Quantification Measures.

Authors:  Shalin A Parikh; Raymond Gomez; Mirunalini Thirugnanasambandam; Sathyajeeth S Chauhan; Victor De Oliveira; Satish C Muluk; Mark K Eskandari; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  A framework for the automatic generation of surface topologies for abdominal aortic aneurysm models.

Authors:  Judy Shum; Amber Xu; Itthi Chatnuntawech; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Perspectives on stem cell-based elastic matrix regenerative therapies for abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Chris A Bashur; Raj R Rao; Anand Ramamurthi
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 8.  The role of geometric and biomechanical factors in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk assessment.

Authors:  Samarth S Raut; Santanu Chandra; Judy Shum; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  The perianeurysmal environment: influence on saccular aneurysm shape and rupture.

Authors:  D San Millán Ruíz; H Yilmaz; A R Dehdashti; A Alimenti; N de Tribolet; D A Rüfenacht
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  Intracranial and abdominal aortic aneurysms: similarities, differences, and need for a new class of computational models.

Authors:  J D Humphrey; C A Taylor
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.