Literature DB >> 8092386

Patients' rights after health care reform: who decides what is medically necessary?

W K Mariner1.   

Abstract

President Clinton's Health Security Act entitles individuals not to unlimited health care, but to a package of defined insurance benefits with specific exclusions and limitations. Like virtually all reform proposals, it would limit covered benefits to services that are medically necessary. If health reform is to control costs, not all medically necessary care can be covered. In the absence of a generally accepted definition of medical necessity, many services will not be guaranteed to all patients unless they are explicitly covered in the federal legislation or regulations. Without a federal definition of medical necessity or regulations listing covered services, health insurance plans will retain the primary authority to decide what is medically necessary for their patient subscribers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health; Health Security Act (1993 bill); Legal Approach; Medicaid

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8092386      PMCID: PMC1615162          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.84.9.1515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  18 in total

1.  Defining experimental therapy--a third-party payer's dilemma.

Authors:  L N Newcomer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-12-13       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Relation between malpractice claims and adverse events due to negligence. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study III.

Authors:  A R Localio; A G Lawthers; T A Brennan; N M Laird; L E Hebert; L M Peterson; J P Newhouse; P C Weiler; H H Hiatt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Medical malpractice claims filed by Medicaid and non-Medicaid recipients in Maryland.

Authors:  M G Mussman; L Zawistowich; C S Weisman; F E Malitz; L L Morlock
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-06-12       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The experimental treatment exclusion clause. A tool for silent rationing of health care?

Authors:  F P James
Journal:  J Leg Med       Date:  1991-09

5.  From the Office of the General Counsel. Should practice parameters be the standard of care in malpractice litigation?

Authors:  E B Hirshfeld
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Can practice guidelines reduce the number and costs of malpractice claims?

Authors:  D W Garnick; A M Hendricks; T A Brennan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Cancer statistics, 1993.

Authors:  C C Boring; T S Squires; T Tong
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Do the poor sue more? A case-control study of malpractice claims and socioeconomic status.

Authors:  H R Burstin; W G Johnson; S R Lipsitz; T A Brennan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-10-13       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The overdiagnosis of Lyme disease.

Authors:  A C Steere; E Taylor; G L McHugh; E L Logigian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-04-14       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The safety and immunogenicity of a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) recombinant gp160 candidate vaccine in humans. NIAID AIDS Vaccine Clinical Trials Network.

Authors:  R Dolin; B S Graham; S B Greenberg; C O Tacket; R B Belshe; K Midthun; M L Clements; G J Gorse; B W Horgan; R L Atmar
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  2 in total

1.  Medical necessity and defined coverage benefits in the Oregon Health Plan.

Authors:  P A Glassman; P D Jacobson; S Asch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Rationing health care and the need for credible scarcity: why Americans can't say no.

Authors:  W K Mariner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.308

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.