Literature DB >> 8409694

How reliable is digital examination for the evaluation of anal sphincter tone?

V F Eckardt1, G Kanzler.   

Abstract

This study investigates whether digital examination of the anal canal can differentiate reliably between competent and incompetent sphincters. Digital examinations were performed by an experienced proctologist who was blinded with regard to the patient's history as well as manometric and endoscopic findings. There was poor correlation between manometric findings and digital assessment of anal sphincter tone. The sensitivity of digital examination for diagnosing incompetent sphincters ranged from 63% to 84%, whereas specificity was calculated as only 57%. It is concluded that even the experienced examiner needs to use more sophisticated methods than digital examination for the evaluation of anal sphincter competence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8409694     DOI: 10.1007/bf00299335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  6 in total

1.  Validation of the digital rectal examination as an estimate of anal sphincter squeeze pressure.

Authors:  J N Kaushal; F Goldner
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Reliability of anal pressure measurements.

Authors:  V F Eckardt; T Elmer
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Investigation of anorectal function.

Authors:  R J Felt-Bersma; E C Klinkenberg-Knol; S G Meuwissen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Physical examination of the anorectum: a systematic technique.

Authors:  L Rosen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  A clinical study of patients with fecal incontinence and diarrhea.

Authors:  N W Read; W V Harford; A C Schmulen; M G Read; C Santa Ana; J S Fordtran
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Comparison of digital and manometric assessment of anal sphincter function.

Authors:  R I Hallan; D E Marzouk; D J Waldron; N R Womack; N S Williams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 6.939

  6 in total
  13 in total

1.  Predicting anal sphincter defects: the value of clinical examination and manometry.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Roos; Zeelha Abdool; Ranee Thakar; Abdul H Sultan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  The diagnostic value of a digital rectal examination compared with high-resolution anorectal manometry in patients with chronic constipation and fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Jae Seung Soh; Hyo Jeong Lee; Kee Wook Jung; In Ja Yoon; Hyun Sook Koo; So Young Seo; Seohyun Lee; Jung Ho Bae; Ho-Su Lee; Sang Hyoung Park; Dong-Hoon Yang; Kyung-Jo Kim; Byong Duk Ye; Jeong-Sik Byeon; Suk-Kyun Yang; Jin-Ho Kim; Seung-Jae Myung
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Factors affecting continence after fistulotomy for intersphincteric fistula-in-ano.

Authors:  Takayuki Toyonaga; Makoto Matsushima; Takashi Kiriu; Nobuhito Sogawa; Hiroki Kanyama; Naomi Matsumura; Yasuhiro Shimojima; Tomoaki Hatakeyama; Yoshiaki Tanaka; Kazunori Suzuki; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  An Evidence-Based Approach to the Evaluation, Diagnostic Assessment and Treatment of Fecal Incontinence in Women.

Authors:  Isuzu Meyer; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep       Date:  2014-09

Review 5.  Faecal incontinence in adults.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Charles H Knowles; Isabelle Mack; Allison Malcolm; Nicholas Oblizajek; Satish Rao; S Mark Scott; Andrea Shin; Paul Enck
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 65.038

6.  Discriminative value of anorectal manometry in clinical practice.

Authors:  Naeem Raza; Klaus Bielefeldt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Management of patients with faecal incontinence.

Authors:  Jakob Duelund-Jakobsen; Jonas Worsoe; Lilli Lundby; Peter Christensen; Klaus Krogh
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.409

8.  No Evidence Supporting the Routine Use of Digital Rectal Examinations in Trauma Patients.

Authors:  Salvatore Docimo; Laurence Diggs; Laura Crankshaw; Young Lee; Fausto Vinces
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 9.  Irritable bowel syndrome and chronic constipation: Fact and fiction.

Authors:  Massimo Bellini; Dario Gambaccini; Paolo Usai-Satta; Nicola De Bortoli; Lorenzo Bertani; Santino Marchi; Cristina Stasi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Anal inspection and digital rectal examination compared to anorectal physiology tests and endoanal ultrasonography in evaluating fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Annette C Dobben; Maaike P Terra; Marije Deutekom; Michael F Gerhards; A Bart Bijnen; Richelle J F Felt-Bersma; Lucas W M Janssen; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.