Literature DB >> 2058632

Validation of the digital rectal examination as an estimate of anal sphincter squeeze pressure.

J N Kaushal1, F Goldner.   

Abstract

Although digital examination is commonly used to assess anal sphincter tone and maximal squeeze pressure, the accuracy of this test has never been adequately validated. A total of 27 patients with a spectrum of subjectively assessed anal sphincter tones were studied. Simultaneous subjective (digital) and objective (manometric) determinations of maximal anal squeeze pressures were made. Subjective digital assessment revealed the following: three patients, absent squeeze pressure (grade 0); two patients, markedly reduced (grade +1); six patients, reduced (grade +2); and the remaining 16 patients had normal maximal squeeze pressure (grade +3). Simultaneous objective anal sphincter pressure measurements, when compared with these subjective values, revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.97 (p less than 0.05). Therefore, the clinician can reliably use the digital rectal examination to judge anal sphincter strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2058632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  4 in total

1.  Predicting anal sphincter defects: the value of clinical examination and manometry.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Roos; Zeelha Abdool; Ranee Thakar; Abdul H Sultan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  How reliable is digital examination for the evaluation of anal sphincter tone?

Authors:  V F Eckardt; G Kanzler
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Anal inspection and digital rectal examination compared to anorectal physiology tests and endoanal ultrasonography in evaluating fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Annette C Dobben; Maaike P Terra; Marije Deutekom; Michael F Gerhards; A Bart Bijnen; Richelle J F Felt-Bersma; Lucas W M Janssen; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Management of fourth degree obstetric perineal tear without colostomy using non - stimulated gracilis - our experience over eleven years.

Authors:  Jiten Kulkarni; Anuradha J Patil; Bhaskar Musande; Abhishek B Bhamare
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Apr
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.