Literature DB >> 8408969

Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. II: Frequency and interpulse interval.

B E Pfingst1, D J Morris.   

Abstract

Psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea were measured in nonhuman primates (macaques) as part of a series of experiments exploring the stimulus features affecting detection. The monkeys were trained psychophysically using operant conditioning. One ear was treated with neomycin to destroy hair cells, and implanted with electrodes in the scala tympani and/or the cochlear wall. In experiment 1, detection thresholds were measured for trains of fixed-duration pulses and for sinusoids. For long-duration pulses (1 to 2 ms/phase), thresholds decreased as a function of frequency (pulse rate), reaching a minimum at a frequency between 125 and 210 pps, then increased as frequency was further increased. For shorter duration pulses, thresholds usually decreased monotonically as a function of frequency but sometimes showed a slight increase as a function of frequency near the highest frequencies tested. Typically slopes of the threshold versus frequency functions for fixed-duration pulses were equal to or less than slopes of threshold versus frequency functions for sinusoidal signals, where frequency and phase duration covaried. Additional observations on two of the cases were made in experiments 2 and 3. In experiment 2, thresholds for pairs of pulses were measured as a function of interpulse interval. Thresholds decreased as a function of interpulse interval up to intervals of 2 to 4 ms and then increased slightly. In experiment 3, thresholds were measured as a function of stimulus duration at two frequencies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8408969     DOI: 10.1121/1.408155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  Spatial selectivity to intracochlear electrical stimulation in the inferior colliculus is degraded after long-term deafness in cats.

Authors:  Maike Vollmer; Ralph E Beitel; Russell L Snyder; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Integration of Pulse Trains in Humans and Guinea Pigs with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Casey T Kraft; Deborah J Colesa; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-20

3.  Characteristics of detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels as a function of pulse rate in human cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Li Xu; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Comparison of Multi-Compartment Cable Models of Human Auditory Nerve Fibers.

Authors:  Richard Bachmaier; Jörg Encke; Miguel Obando-Leitón; Werner Hemmert; Siwei Bai
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  The Effect of Phantom Stimulation and Pseudomonophasic Pulse Shapes on Pitch Perception by Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Wiebke Lamping; John M Deeks; Jeremy Marozeau; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-08-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.