Literature DB >> 8408531

The increased risk of complication observed in singleton pregnancies resulting from in-vitro fertilization (IVF) does not seem to be related to the IVF method itself.

F Olivennes1, P Rufat, B André, A Pourade, M C Quiros, R Frydman.   

Abstract

Singleton pregnancies resulting from in-vitro fertilization (IVF) seem to have an increased risk of obstetric and paediatric complications. In a retrospective study we compared, during the same period, 162 IVF singleton pregnancies with 263 pregnancies resulting from stimulated cycles (without IVF) and with 5096 natural pregnancies. No significant difference was found between the first two groups concerning complications (i.e. prematurity, low birthweight, small-for-gestational-age and perinatal mortality). The results indicate that an adverse outcome is more common for pregnancies after ovarian stimulation (with or without IVF) compared to natural pregnancies. Therefore the increased risk does not appear to be linked to the IVF method itself but rather to a common factor in these two populations, i.e. population characteristics, underlying infertile status and/or ovarian stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8408531     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  13 in total

Review 1.  Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies.

Authors:  Frans M Helmerhorst; Denise A M Perquin; Diane Donker; Marc J N C Keirse
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-23

2.  Subfecundity and neonatal mortality: longitudinal study within the Danish national birth cohort.

Authors:  Olga Basso; Jørn Olsen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-02-04

3.  Perinatal outcome of pregnancies after assisted reproduction: a case-control study.

Authors:  M Dhont; F De Neubourg; J Van der Elst; P De Sutter
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Elevated progesterone and its impact on birth weight after fresh embryo transfers.

Authors:  Yetunde Ibrahim; Miriam J Haviland; Michele R Hacker; Alan S Penzias; Kim L Thornton; Denny Sakkas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Risk of Preeclampsia in Pregnancies After Assisted Reproductive Technology and Ovarian Stimulation.

Authors:  Angela S Martin; Michael Monsour; Jennifer F Kawwass; Sheree L Boulet; Dmitry M Kissin; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-10

6.  Are singleton assisted reproductive technology pregnancies at risk of prematurity?

Authors:  T Perri; R Chen; R Yoeli; P Merlob; R Orvieto; Y Shalev; Z Ben-Rafael; I Bar-Hava
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  The impact of assisted reproduction on perinatal health care.

Authors:  M J Keirse; F M Helmerhorst
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1995

Review 8.  Low birth weight: is it related to assisted reproductive technology or underlying infertility?

Authors:  Laxmi A Kondapalli; Alfredo Perales-Puchalt
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Gestational hypertension in pregnancies supported by infertility treatments: role of infertility, treatments, and multiple gestations.

Authors:  Sonia Hernández-Díaz; Martha M Werler; Allen A Mitchell
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  A population-based study of maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology in Massachusetts.

Authors:  Laura A Schieve; Bruce Cohen; Angela Nannini; Cynthia Ferre; Meredith A Reynolds; Zi Zhang; Gary Jeng; Maurizio Macaluso; Victoria C Wright
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-03-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.