Literature DB >> 8407646

Considerations on genetic connectedness between management units under an animal model.

B W Kennedy1, D Trus.   

Abstract

Connectedness among management units (e.g., herds or regions) is of concern in genetic evaluation. When genetic evaluation is under an animal model, connections occur through A, the numerator relationship matrix. It is argued that the most appropriate measure of connectedness is the average prediction error variance (PEV) of differences in EBV between animals in different management units. It is shown that PEV of differences is influenced by average genetic relationship between and within management units, which in turn affects the variances of estimates of differences between management unit effects. When PEV of differences cannot be computed, use of one of three alternative measures is proposed; the gene-flow method that measures the exchange of genes between management units, measurement of genetic drift variance based on average relationships between and within management units, and measurement of the variance of estimated differences between management units effects. These were correlated with PEV of differences in a test simulation. The gene-flow method, which is simplest to compute, had the lowest correlation (.671). The drift variance and variance of management unit effects methods were highly correlated with PEV of differences (.924 and .995, respectively).

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8407646     DOI: 10.2527/1993.7192341x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  16 in total

1.  Graph-based data selection for the construction of genomic prediction models.

Authors:  Steven Maenhout; Bernard De Baets; Geert Haesaert
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Simultaneous Estimation of Additive and Mutational Genetic Variance in an Outbred Population of Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Katrina McGuigan; J David Aguirre; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Connectedness among herds of beef cattle bred under natural service.

Authors:  Joaquim Tarrés; Marta Fina; Jesús Piedrafita
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Herd clustering strategies and corresponding genetic evaluations based on social-ecological characteristics for a local endangered cattle breed.

Authors:  Jonas Herold; Kerstin Brügemann; Sven König
Journal:  Arch Anim Breed       Date:  2021-05-26

5.  Training set optimization under population structure in genomic selection.

Authors:  Julio Isidro; Jean-Luc Jannink; Deniz Akdemir; Jesse Poland; Nicolas Heslot; Mark E Sorrells
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Accounting for genetic differences among unknown parents in microevolutionary studies: how to include genetic groups in quantitative genetic animal models.

Authors:  Matthew E Wolak; Jane M Reid
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  Estimation of genetic connectedness diagnostics based on prediction errors without the prediction error variance-covariance matrix.

Authors:  John B Holmes; Ken G Dodds; Michael A Lee
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  Imputation of unordered markers and the impact on genomic selection accuracy.

Authors:  Jessica E Rutkoski; Jesse Poland; Jean-Luc Jannink; Mark E Sorrells
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Genomic Relatedness Strengthens Genetic Connectedness Across Management Units.

Authors:  Haipeng Yu; Matthew L Spangler; Ronald M Lewis; Gota Morota
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Quantifying genomic connectedness and prediction accuracy from additive and non-additive gene actions.

Authors:  Mehdi Momen; Gota Morota
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.