Literature DB >> 8405727

Mismatch negativity in the neurophysiologic/behavioral evaluation of auditory processing deficits: a case study.

N Kraus1, T McGee, J Ferre, J A Hoeppner, T Carrell, A Sharma, T Nicol.   

Abstract

The subject of this case report is an 18-year-old woman with grossly abnormal auditory brain stem response (ABR), normal peripheral hearing, and specific behavioral auditory processing deficits. Auditory middle latency responses (MLRs) and cortical potentials N1, P2, and P300 were intact. The mismatch negativity (MMN) was normal in response to certain synthesized speech stimuli and impaired to others--consistent with her behavioral discrimination of these stimuli. Behavioral tests of auditory processing were consistent with auditory brain stem dysfunction. A neuropsychological evaluation revealed normal intellectual and academic performance. The subject was in her first year of college at the time of the evaluation. This case study is important because: (1) Although there have been several reports of absent/abnormal ABR with preserved peripheral hearing and deficits in auditory processing, little is known about the specific nature of the auditory deficits experienced by these individuals. Such information may be valuable to the clinical management of patients with this constellation of findings. (2) Of interest is the information that the mismatch negativity (MMN) cortical event-related potential can bring to the evaluation of patients with auditory processing deficits. The MMN reflects central auditory processing of small acoustic differences and may provide an objective measure of auditory discrimination. (3) From a theorectical standpoint, a patient with neural deficits affecting specific components of the auditory pathway provides insight into the relationship between evoked potentials and physiological mechanisms of auditory processing. How do various components of the auditory pathway contribute to speech discrimination? How might evoked potentials reflect the processes underlying the neural coding of specific features of speech stimuli such as timing and spectral cues?

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8405727     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199308000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  6 in total

1.  Central recruitment in individual with auditory neuropathy.

Authors:  Preeti Sahu; Rajkishor Mishra; Debadatta Mahallik; Imran Ansari; Varsha Mungutwar
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-08-21

2.  Assessment of cochlear implant candidacy in patients with cochlear nerve deficiency using the P1 CAEP biomarker.

Authors:  Peter Roland; Kathryn Henion; Timothy Booth; Julia Dee Campbell; Anu Sharma
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2012-02

3.  N100 cortical potentials accompanying disrupted auditory nerve activity in auditory neuropathy (AN): effects of signal intensity and continuous noise.

Authors:  Henry J Michalewski; Arnold Starr; Fan-Gang Zeng; Andrew Dimitrijevic
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  [Late auditory potentials (NC-ERP) in children with symptoms of auditory processing and perception disorder. With and without attention deficit disorder].

Authors:  M Ptok; P Blachnik; R Schönweiler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Effects of Presentation Rate and Attention on Auditory Discrimination: A Comparison of Long-Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials in School-Aged Children and Adults.

Authors:  Naseem A Choudhury; Jessica A Parascando; April A Benasich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Potential Use of MEG to Understand Abnormalities in Auditory Function in Clinical Populations.

Authors:  Eric Larson; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.