Literature DB >> 8403174

Patient response to laryngeal mask insertion after induction of anaesthesia with propofol or thiopentone.

P Scanlon1, M Carey, M Power, F Kirby.   

Abstract

The response to insertion of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) following either propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1 or thiopentone 5 mg.kg-1 was assessed in two groups of patients. The purpose of the study was to ascertain which of these two induction agents provided the better conditions for insertion of the LMA. Anaesthesia was induced by propofol in 35 patients and by thiopentone in 37. Following induction, ventilation was assisted for two minutes using 50% oxygen and nitrous oxide and 2% isoflurane, before insertion of the LMA. The presence of gagging, coughing, laryngospasm and movement was noted and graded. Thiopentone was associated with an adverse response in 76% of patients, compared with propofol in 26% (P < 0.01). Gagging, laryngospasm and head movement were more common using thiopentone (P < 0.01, P < 0.05 and P < 0.05 respectively) and in 11% (P < 0.05) of the thiopentone group insertion of the LMA was impossible due to inadequate relaxation. We conclude that, using these doses, propofol is superior to thiopentone as an induction agent for insertion of the laryngeal mask airway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8403174     DOI: 10.1007/BF03009250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  6 in total

1.  Role of the laryngeal mask in airway management.

Authors:  J A Fisher; C Ananthanarayan; G Edelist
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Comparison of propofol and thiopentone for laryngeal mask insertion.

Authors:  G W Brown; N Patel; F R Ellis
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Ventilatory effects of propofol during induction of anaesthesia. Comparison with thiopentone.

Authors:  M B Taylor; R M Grounds; P D Mulrooney; M Morgan
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  The effects of thiopentone and propofol on upper airway integrity.

Authors:  K McKeating; I M Bali; J W Dundee
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Comparison of the effect of diisopropyl phenol (ICI 35, 868) and thiopentone on response to somatic pain.

Authors:  L P Briggs; J W Dundee; M Bahar; R S Clarke
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Pharmacodynamic modeling of thiopental anesthesia.

Authors:  D R Stanski; R J Hudson; T D Homer; L J Saidman; E Meathe
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1984-04
  6 in total
  27 in total

1.  Comparison of propofol versus thiopentone with midazolam or lidocaine to facilitate laryngeal mask insertion.

Authors:  P Bapat; R N Joshi; E Young; R H Jago
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 2.  Induction of anaesthesia: a guide to drug choice.

Authors:  Nathalie Nathan; Isabelle Odin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Comparison of Dexmedetomidine-Propofol versus Fentanyl-Propofol on Insertion Conditions of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway.

Authors:  Shalaka Sandeep Nellore; Abhijeet Dattatray Waychal; Preeti Sachin Rustagi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

4.  Intraoperative bronchospasm with thiopental.

Authors:  Aparna Shukla
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2010-03

Review 5.  Propofol. An update of its use in anaesthesia and conscious sedation.

Authors:  H M Bryson; B R Fulton; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  The effects of sevoflurane with propofol and remifentanil on tracheal intubation conditions without neuromuscular blocking agents.

Authors:  Wook Jong Kim; Seong Soo Choi; Doo Hwan Kim; Hye Jeong Seo; Eun Ha Suk; Seung Woo Ku; Pyung Hwan Park
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-08-20

7.  Comparison of propofol (1%) with admixture (1:1) of thiopentone (1.25%) and propofol (0.5%) for laryngeal mask airway insertion in children undergoing elective eye surgery: Double-masked randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Renu Sinha; Dilip Shende; Rakesh Garg
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2010-03

8.  Comparison of the trapezius squeezing test and jaw thrust as indicators for laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults.

Authors:  Chul-Ho Chang; Soo-Hwan Kim; Yon-Hee Shim; Jae-Hoon Kim; Yang-Sik Shin
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-09-23

9.  Randomized double-blind comparison of ketamine-propofol and fentanyl-propofol for the insertion of laryngeal mask airway in children.

Authors:  Ranju Singh; Madhur Arora; Homay Vajifdar
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-01

10.  Comparison of thiopentone with lidocaine spray vs propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion at tikur anbessa specialized hospital. A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Engidawork Belete; Misrak W/Yahones; Zemedu Aweke; Getahun Dendir; Simeneh Mola; Derartu Neme; Getnet Melaku; Siraj Ahmed; Teshome Regasa; Brook Tesfaye
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.