Literature DB >> 8400876

Positive and negative regulatory regions control the spatial distribution of polygalacturonase transcription in tomato fruit pericarp.

J Montgomery1, V Pollard, J Deikman, R L Fischer.   

Abstract

The tomato fruit consists of a thick, fleshy pericarp composed predominantly of highly vacuolated parenchymatous cells, which surrounds the seeds. During ripening, the activation of gene expression results in dramatic biochemical and physiological changes in the pericarp. The polygalacturonase (PG) gene, unlike many fruit ripening-induced genes, is not activated by the increase in ethylene hormone concentration associated with the onset of ripening. To investigate ethylene concentration-independent gene transcription in ripe tomato fruit, we analyzed the expression of chimeric PG promoter-beta-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene fusions in transgenic tomato plants. We determined that a 1.4-kb PG promoter directs ripening-regulated transcription in outer pericarp but not in inner pericarp cells, with a sharp boundary of PG promoter activity located midway through the pericarp. Promoter deletion analysis indicated that a minimum of three promoter regions influence the spatial regulation of PG transcription. A positive regulatory region from -231 to -134 promotes gene transcription in the outer pericarp of ripe fruit. A second positive regulatory region from -806 to -443 extends gene activity to the inner pericarp. However, a negative regulatory region from -1411 to -1150 inhibits gene transcription in the inner pericarp. DNase I footprint analysis showed that nuclear proteins in unripe and ripe fruit interact with DNA sequences within each of these three regulatory regions. Thus, temporal and spatial control of PG transcription is mediated by the interaction of negative and positive regulatory promoter elements, resulting in gene activity in the outer pericarp but not the inner pericarp of ripe tomato fruit. The expression pattern of PG suggests that, although they are morphologically similar, there is a fundamental difference between the parenchymatous cells within the inner and outer pericarp.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8400876      PMCID: PMC160340          DOI: 10.1105/tpc.5.9.1049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell        ISSN: 1040-4651            Impact factor:   11.277


  38 in total

1.  The HMG domain of lymphoid enhancer factor 1 bends DNA and facilitates assembly of functional nucleoprotein structures.

Authors:  K Giese; J Cox; R Grosschedl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-04-03       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Inheritance and effect on ripening of antisense polygalacturonase genes in transgenic tomatoes.

Authors:  C J Smith; C F Watson; P C Morris; C R Bird; G B Seymour; J E Gray; C Arnold; G A Tucker; W Schuch; S Harding
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Immunocytolocalization of polygalacturonase in ripening tomato fruit.

Authors:  D M Tieman; A K Handa
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Reduction of polygalacturonase activity in tomato fruit by antisense RNA.

Authors:  R E Sheehy; M Kramer; W R Hiatt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Transcriptional Analysis of Polygalacturonase and Other Ripening Associated Genes in Rutgers, rin, nor, and Nr Tomato Fruit.

Authors:  D Dellapenna; J E Lincoln; R L Fischer; A B Bennett
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  High mobility group chromosomal proteins bind to AT-rich tracts flanking plant genes.

Authors:  T J Pedersen; L J Arwood; S Spiker; M J Guiltinan; W F Thompson
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.076

7.  Reversible inhibition of tomato fruit senescence by antisense RNA.

Authors:  P W Oeller; M W Lu; L P Taylor; D A Pike; A Theologis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-10-18       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase in tomato is encoded by a multigene family whose transcription is induced during fruit and floral senescence.

Authors:  W H Rottmann; G F Peter; P W Oeller; J A Keller; N F Shen; B P Nagy; L P Taylor; A D Campbell; A Theologis
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1991-12-20       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  A negatively acting DNA sequence element mediates phytochrome-directed repression of phyA gene transcription.

Authors:  W B Bruce; X W Deng; P H Quail
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Positive and negative cis-acting DNA domains are required for spatial and temporal regulation of gene expression by a seed storage protein promoter.

Authors:  M M Bustos; D Begum; F A Kalkan; M J Battraw; T C Hall
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  26 in total

1.  Polygalacturonase gene expression in kiwifruit: relationship to fruit softening and ethylene production.

Authors:  Z Y Wang; E A MacRae; M A Wright; K M Bolitho; G S Ross; R G Atkinson
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  Novel promoters that induce specific transgene expression during the green to ripening stages of tomato fruit development.

Authors:  Kyoko Hiwasa-Tanase; Hirofumi Kuroda; Tadayoshi Hirai; Koh Aoki; Kenichi Takane; Hiroshi Ezura
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 4.570

3.  A sweetpotato SRD1 promoter confers strong root-, taproot-, and tuber-specific expression in Arabidopsis, carrot, and potato.

Authors:  Seol Ah Noh; Haeng-Soon Lee; Gyung Hye Huh; Mi-Joung Oh; Kyung-Hee Paek; Jeong Sheop Shin; Jung Myung Bae
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  The tomato MADS-box transcription factor RIPENING INHIBITOR interacts with promoters involved in numerous ripening processes in a COLORLESS NONRIPENING-dependent manner.

Authors:  Catherine Martel; Julia Vrebalov; Petra Tafelmeyer; James J Giovannoni
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Developmental regulation of two tomato lipoxygenase promoters in transgenic tobacco and tomato.

Authors:  N Beaudoin; S J Rothstein
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.076

6.  Repression of the L-asparaginase gene during nodule development in Lupinus angustifolius.

Authors:  E Vincze; J M Reeves; E Lamping; K J Farnden; P H Reynolds
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.076

7.  Characterization of the Sol3 family of nonautonomous transposable elements in tomato and potato.

Authors:  T Oosumi; W R Belknap
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Analysis of a dehiscence zone endo-polygalacturonase in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and Arabidopsis thaliana: evidence for roles in cell separation in dehiscence and abscission zones, and in stylar tissues during pollen tube growth.

Authors:  L Sander; R Child; P Ulvskov; M Albrechtsen; B Borkhardt
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.076

9.  The Tomato E8 Gene Influences Ethylene Biosynthesis in Fruit but Not in Flowers.

Authors:  M. L. Kneissl; J. Deikman
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  The promoter of LE-ACS7, an early flooding-induced 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase gene of the tomato, is tagged by a Sol3 transposon.

Authors:  O Y Shiu; J H Oetiker; W K Yip; S F Yang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.