Literature DB >> 8399200

Refined 1.8-A structure reveals the mode of binding of beta-cyclodextrin to the maltodextrin binding protein.

A J Sharff1, L E Rodseth, F A Quiocho.   

Abstract

The maltodextrin binding protein from Escherichia coli serves as the initial receptor for both the active transport of and chemotaxis toward a range of linear maltose sugars. The X-ray structures of both the maltose-bound and sugar-free forms of the protein have been previously described [Spurlino, J. C., Lu, G.-Y., & Quiocho, F. A. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 5202-5219; Sharff, A. J., Rodseth, L. E., Spurlino, J. C., & Quocho, F. A. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 10657-10663]. The X-ray crystal structure of the maltodextrin binding protein complexed with cyclomaltoheptaose (beta-cyclodextrin) has been determined from a single crystal. The structure has been refined to a final R-value of 21% at 1.8-A resolution. Although not a physiological ligand for the maltodextrin binding protein, beta-cyclodextrin has been shown to bind with a Kd of the same order as those of the linear maltodextrin substrates. The observed structure shows that the complexed protein remains in the fully open conformation and is almost identical to the structure of the unliganded protein. The sugar sits in the open cleft with three glucosyl units bound to the C-domain at the base of the cleft, in a similar position to maltotriose, the most tightly bound ligand. The top of the ring is loosely bound to the upper edge of the cleft on the N-domain. The sugar makes a total of 94 productive interactions (of less than 4.0-A length) with the protein and with bound water molecules.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8399200     DOI: 10.1021/bi00091a004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  37 in total

1.  A method for incorporating dipolar couplings into structure calculations in cases of (near) axial symmetry of alignment.

Authors:  G A Mueller; W Y Choy; N R Skrynnikov; L E Kay
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Direct structure refinement of high molecular weight proteins against residual dipolar couplings and carbonyl chemical shift changes upon alignment: an application to maltose binding protein.

Authors:  W Y Choy; M Tollinger; G A Mueller; L E Kay
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Evaluation of the relative stability of liganded versus ligand-free protein conformations using Simplicial Neighborhood Analysis of Protein Packing (SNAPP) method.

Authors:  Douglas B Sherman; Shuxing Zhang; J Bruce Pitner; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-09-01

4.  Optimal bundling of transmembrane helices using sparse distance constraints.

Authors:  Ken Sale; Jean-Loup Faulon; Genetha A Gray; Joseph S Schoeniger; Malin M Young
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Backbone assignment of proteins with known structure using residual dipolar couplings.

Authors:  Young-Sang Jung; Markus Zweckstetter
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  Evidence for an allosteric mechanism of substrate release from membrane-transporter accessory binding proteins.

Authors:  Fabrizio Marinelli; Sonja I Kuhlmann; Ernst Grell; Hans-Jörg Kunte; Christine Ziegler; José D Faraldo-Gómez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  A community resource of experimental data for NMR / X-ray crystal structure pairs.

Authors:  John K Everett; Roberto Tejero; Sarath B K Murthy; Thomas B Acton; James M Aramini; Michael C Baran; Jordi Benach; John R Cort; Alexander Eletsky; Farhad Forouhar; Rongjin Guan; Alexandre P Kuzin; Hsiau-Wei Lee; Gaohua Liu; Rajeswari Mani; Binchen Mao; Jeffrey L Mills; Alexander F Montelione; Kari Pederson; Robert Powers; Theresa Ramelot; Paolo Rossi; Jayaraman Seetharaman; David Snyder; G V T Swapna; Sergey M Vorobiev; Yibing Wu; Rong Xiao; Yunhuang Yang; Cheryl H Arrowsmith; John F Hunt; Michael A Kennedy; James H Prestegard; Thomas Szyperski; Liang Tong; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Domain orientation in beta-cyclodextrin-loaded maltose binding protein: diffusion anisotropy measurements confirm the results of a dipolar coupling study.

Authors:  P M Hwang; N R Skrynnikov; L E Kay
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  The interplay between effector binding and allostery in an engineered protein switch.

Authors:  Jay H Choi; Tina Xiong; Marc Ostermeier
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  The binding of beta- and gamma-cyclodextrins to glycogen phosphorylase b: kinetic and crystallographic studies.

Authors:  Nikos Pinotsis; Demetres D Leonidas; Evangelia D Chrysina; Nikos G Oikonomakos; Irene M Mavridis
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.