Literature DB >> 15340162

Optimal bundling of transmembrane helices using sparse distance constraints.

Ken Sale1, Jean-Loup Faulon, Genetha A Gray, Joseph S Schoeniger, Malin M Young.   

Abstract

We present a two-step approach to modeling the transmembrane spanning helical bundles of integral membrane proteins using only sparse distance constraints, such as those derived from chemical cross-linking, dipolar EPR and FRET experiments. In Step 1, using an algorithm, we developed, the conformational space of membrane protein folds matching a set of distance constraints is explored to provide initial structures for local conformational searches. In Step 2, these structures refined against a custom penalty function that incorporates both measures derived from statistical analysis of solved membrane protein structures and distance constraints obtained from experiments. We begin by describing the statistical analysis of the solved membrane protein structures from which the theoretical portion of the penalty function was derived. We then describe the penalty function, and, using a set of six test cases, demonstrate that it is capable of distinguishing helical bundles that are close to the native bundle from those that are far from the native bundle. Finally, using a set of only 27 distance constraints extracted from the literature, we show that our method successfully recovers the structure of dark-adapted rhodopsin to within 3.2 A of the crystal structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15340162      PMCID: PMC2286557          DOI: 10.1110/ps.04781504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  75 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in FRET: distance determination in protein-DNA complexes.

Authors:  A Hillisch; M Lorenz; S Diekmann
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.809

2.  Gene3D: structural assignment for whole genes and genomes using the CATH domain structure database.

Authors:  Daniel W A Buchan; Adrian J Shepherd; David Lee; Frances M G Pearl; Stuart C G Rison; Janet M Thornton; Christine A Orengo
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Studies on the structure of the G-protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin including the putative G-protein binding site in unactivated and activated forms.

Authors:  P L Yeagle; G Choi; A D Albert
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-10-02       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  State-dependent disulfide cross-linking in rhodopsin.

Authors:  H Yu; M Kono; D D Oprian
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-09-14       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Low resolution structure of bovine rhodopsin determined by electron cryo-microscopy.

Authors:  V M Unger; G F Schertler
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  EPR approaches to ion channel structure and function.

Authors:  E Perozo; L G Cuello; D M Cortes; Y S Liu; P Sompornpisut
Journal:  Novartis Found Symp       Date:  2002

7.  Characterization of an antagonist interleukin-6 dimer by stable isotope labeling, cross-linking, and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Thomas Taverner; Nathan E Hall; Richard A J O'Hair; Richard J Simpson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  A top down approach to protein structural studies using chemical cross-linking and Fourier transform mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Gary H Kruppa; Joseph Schoeniger; Malin M Young
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Structure of native and apo carbonic anhydrase II and structure of some of its anion-ligand complexes.

Authors:  K Håkansson; M Carlsson; L A Svensson; A Liljas
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1992-10-20       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 10.  Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) microscopy imaging of live cell protein localizations.

Authors:  Rajesh Babu Sekar; Ammasi Periasamy
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2003-03-03       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  8 in total

1.  Elucidating the higher-order structure of biopolymers by structural probing and mass spectrometry: MS3D.

Authors:  Daniele Fabris; Eizadora T Yu
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.982

2.  Simplified modeling approach suggests structural mechanisms for constitutive activation of the C5a receptor.

Authors:  Gregory V Nikiforovich; Garland R Marshall; Thomas J Baranski
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-11-30

3.  Computational prediction of atomic structures of helical membrane proteins aided by EM maps.

Authors:  Julio A Kovacs; Mark Yeager; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Alpha-helical topology prediction and generation of distance restraints in membrane proteins.

Authors:  Scott R McAllister; Christodoulos A Floudas
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Rapid Simulation of Unprocessed DEER Decay Data for Protein Fold Prediction.

Authors:  Diego Del Alamo; Maxx H Tessmer; Richard A Stein; Jimmy B Feix; Hassane S Mchaourab; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  A photon-free approach to transmembrane protein structure determination.

Authors:  Cinque S Soto; Brett T Hannigan; William F DeGrado
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Structural refinement of membrane proteins by restrained molecular dynamics and solvent accessibility data.

Authors:  Pornthep Sompornpisut; Benoît Roux; Eduardo Perozo
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Structure modeling of all identified G protein-coupled receptors in the human genome.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Mark E Devries; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 4.475

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.