Literature DB >> 8399010

Effectiveness of antenatal care: a population based study.

B Backe1, J Nakling.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the effectiveness of antenatal care as a screening for nonsymptomatic disease and obstetrical risk conditions.
DESIGN: Programme evaluation of antenatal care in a geographically based cohort.
SETTING: Routine clinical practice in primary and specialist level of health care without intervention.
SUBJECTS: One thousand nine hundred and eight women residing in one Norwegian county giving birth during a 12 month period, 1988 to 1989. OUTCOME MEASURES: The detection rates at the time of delivery, for women with five conditions: twin pregnancies, placenta praevia, breech presentation, small for gestational age (SGA) and pre-eclampsia.
RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-two women had one or more of the actual conditions, 124 (42%) had been diagnosed at the time of the delivery. The detection rate for SGA was remarkably low (14%). The detection rates for pre-eclampsia (75%), breech presentation (69%), placenta praevia (57%) and twin pregnancies (94%) were in the same range as results reported in the literature. The number of false positive antenatal diagnosis was insignificant.
CONCLUSIONS: Assessing the effectiveness of antenatal diagnosis of growth retardation is connected with major unsolved methodological problems. Clinical management of such cases may be better than indicated by the results based on the ultimate SGA classification. For important obstetrical conditions this study describes an applicable method for practical evaluation of the effectiveness of antenatal care. Areas where care could be improved are demonstrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8399010     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb14263.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  13 in total

1.  Medicalization and obstetric care: an analysis of developments in Dutch midwifery.

Authors:  Anke D J Smeenk; Henk A M J ten Have
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2003

2.  Poor antenatal care in 20 French districts: risk factors and pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  B Blondel; B Marshall
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 3.  Fetal growth surveillance - Current guidelines, practices and challenges.

Authors:  Mandy Williams; Sue Turner; Emily Butler; Jason Gardosi
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2018-03-22

Review 4.  Giving women their own case notes to carry during pregnancy.

Authors:  Heather C Brown; Helen J Smith; Rintaro Mori; Hisashi Noma
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-10-14

5.  Rituals in antenatal care--do we need them?

Authors:  P Steer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-09-18

6.  Maternal and paternal contribution to intergenerational recurrence of breech delivery: population based cohort study.

Authors:  Tone Irene Nordtveit; Kari Klungsoyr Melve; Susanne Albrechtsen; Rolv Skjaerven
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-03-27

7.  The use of angiogenic biomarkers in maternal blood to identify which SGA fetuses will require a preterm delivery and mothers who will develop pre-eclampsia.

Authors:  Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Roberto Romero; Amy E Whitten; Steven J Korzeniewski; Piya Chaemsaithong; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Lami Yeo; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2016

8.  Circulating MicroRNAs in maternal blood as potential biomarkers for fetal hypoxia in-utero.

Authors:  Clare L Whitehead; Wan Tinn Teh; Susan P Walker; Cheryl Leung; Luke Larmour; Stephen Tong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A reassessment of global antenatal care coverage for improving maternal health using sub-Saharan Africa as a case study.

Authors:  John Ele-Ojo Ataguba
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effect of antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age newborns in a risk stratified retrospective cohort.

Authors:  Anna Kajdy; Jan Modzelewski; Monika Jakubiak; Artur Pokropek; Michał Rabijewski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.