Literature DB >> 8398023

Predicting recovery of motor complete quadriplegic patients. 24 hour v 72 hour motor index scores.

D M Blaustein1, R Zafonte, D Thomas, G J Herbison, J F Ditunno.   

Abstract

This paper reports motor index scores on motor complete (Frankel A, B), C4-T1, quadriplegic patients at admission, 72 h to 1 week and 6 months after spinal cord injury. This study is designed to test the hypothesis that the 72-h to 1-week motor index score (referred to as 72-h motor score) is superior to motor scores recorded within the first 24 h in predicting 6 month motor scores. Twenty-seven quadriplegic subjects, ages 15-70 years, were followed prospectively using manual muscle test to document motor recovery. Biceps, wrist extensors, triceps, flexor digitorum profoundus and first dorsal interossei were tested within 24 h, 72 h-1 week and 6 months after injury to comprise the motor index score. Average total motor scores for both upper extremities at admission were 14.0, at 72 h 13.9, and at 6 months 19.3 (ANOVA, P < 0.01). Total bilateral motor scores changed by 5.3 from admission to 6 months and by 5.4 from 72 h to 6 months. No significant difference existed between the admission and post 72-h motor score in predicting the 6-month motor score (Newmann-Keuls P > 0.05). Thus, despite significant change in motor score after spinal cord injury, both admission and 72-h motor scores equally predicted 6 month motor recovery of C4-T1 motor complete quadriplegic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8398023     DOI: 10.1097/00002060-199310000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  6 in total

1.  The international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury: intra-rater agreement of total motor and sensory scores in the pediatric population.

Authors:  Ross S Chafetz; John P Gaughan; Lawrence C Vogel; Randal Betz; M J Mulcahey
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Computerized classification of neurologic injury based on the international standards for classification of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ross S Chafetz; Seyla Prak; M J Mulcahey
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Neurologic recovery according to early magnetic resonance imaging findings in traumatic cervical spinal cord injuries.

Authors:  Ji Cheol Shin; Deog Young Kim; Chang Il Park; Yong Wook Kim; Seok Hoon Ohn
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 2.759

4.  Neuromuscular scoliosis in children with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  M J Mulcahey; John P Gaughan; Randal R Betz; Amer F Samdani; Nadia Barakat; Louis N Hunter
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2013

5.  International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury: training effect on accurate classification.

Authors:  Ross S Chafetz; Lawrence C Vogel; Randal R Betz; John P Gaughan; Mary Jane Mulcahey
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 6.  Assessment of impairment in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Julio C Furlan; Vanessa Noonan; Anoushka Singh; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 5.269

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.