Literature DB >> 8397856

Localization of objects in the peripheral visual field.

O Bock1.   

Abstract

We investigated visual localization by asking humans to point at visual objects without vision of their hand. The objects were luminous discs, presented stereoscopically at different distances, eccentricities and meridians with respect to the subjects' straight-ahead. Final pointing position was recorded by an electromagnetic search-coil technique. We found that the eccentricity of pointing responses towards peripheral targets was larger when subjects fixated straight-ahead rather than looked at the targets. This outcome confirmed our previous finding that target eccentricity in the peripheral visual field is overestimated. We further found that overestimation increased less than proportionally with target eccentricity, which suggests that the local magnification factor gradually declines in the visual periphery. A quantitative analysis indicated that the magnification factor is about 1.5 at the fovea, and approaches 1.0 at 10 degrees visual angle. Thus, our data support the hypothesis of a peri-foveal magnification effect which gradually subsides with increasing eccentricity. The observed magnification was similar for the horizontal and the vertical meridian. We found that the egocentric distance of pointing responses depends not only on the distance of the object pointed at, but also on the distance of a second object in the visual field. This outcome was in quantitative agreement with the predictions of Foley's model of interactive distance evaluation. Response depth, i.e. the difference in the response distances towards the two objects, was larger if both objects appeared near the center of the visual field rather than if one object appeared in the visual periphery.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8397856     DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(93)90023-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  29 in total

1.  Functional anatomy of nonvisual feedback loops during reaching: a positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  M Desmurget; H Gréa; J S Grethe; C Prablanc; G E Alexander; S T Grafton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Eye-hand coordination of symmetric bimanual reaching tasks: temporal aspects.

Authors:  Divya Srinivasan; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The use of peripheral vision to guide perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp balance-recovery reactions.

Authors:  Emily C King; Sandra M McKay; Kenneth C Cheng; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Eye-hand coordination while pointing rapidly under risk.

Authors:  Anna Ma-Wyatt; Martin Stritzke; Julia Trommershäuser
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Multiple frames of reference for pointing to a remembered target.

Authors:  Martin Lemay; George E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Judging beforehand the possibility of passing under obstacles without motion: the influence of egocentric and geocentric frames of reference.

Authors:  L Bringoux; G Robic; G M Gauthier; J L Vercher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Influence of gaze elevation on estimating the possibility of passing under high obstacles during body tilt.

Authors:  Aurore Bourrelly; Lionel Bringoux; Jean-Louis Vercher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Perception of auditory, visual, and egocentric spatial alignment adapts differently to changes in eye position.

Authors:  Qi N Cui; Babak Razavi; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The relative contribution of retinal and extraretinal signals in determining the accuracy of reaching movements in normal subjects and a deafferented patient.

Authors:  J Blouin; G M Gauthier; J L Vercher; J Cole
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Effects of anisometropic amblyopia on visuomotor behavior, I: saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo; Herbert C Goltz; Manokaraananthan Chandrakumar; Zahra A Hirji; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.