Literature DB >> 8396642

Effects of surface treatment and bonding agents on bond strength of composite resin to porcelain.

A H Suliman1, E J Swift, J Perdigao.   

Abstract

This study evaluated porcelain repair by use of various surface treatments and hydrophilic bonding resins. The surface treatments were air abrasion (sandblasting), roughening with a diamond, etching with 9.6% hydrofluoric acid, and a combination of the latter two methods. A silane coupling agent was applied to all porcelain surfaces, and composite resin was bonded to porcelain with All-Bond 2, Amalgambond, or Clearfil Porcelain bonding agents. Shear bond strengths were determined on a universal testing machine. The most effective surface treatment was the combination of diamond roughening and hydrofluoric acid etching, but it was not significantly better than the other methods. The Clearfil Porcelain Bond system showed a greater repair strength than the other two materials but was statistically different only from Amalgambond resin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8396642     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90004-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  11 in total

1.  Effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength in two different ceramic systems.

Authors:  Tevfik Yavuz; Erhan Dilber; Haluk Baris Kara; Ali Riza Tuncdemir; A Nilgun Ozturk
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Shear bond, wettability and AFM evaluations on CO2 laser-irradiated CAD/CAM ceramic surfaces.

Authors:  Ahmed El Gamal; Etienne Medioni; Jean Paul Rocca; Carlo Fornaini; Omid H Muhammad; Nathalie Brulat-Bouchard
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Comparative evaluation of bond strength of resin cements with and without 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (mdp) to zirconia and effect of thermocycling on bond strength - An in vitro study.

Authors:  Gopala Abhishek; S K Vishwanath; Anoop Nair; Nagaranjani Prakash; Abhisikta Chakrabarty; Ashrith K Malalur
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-04-01

4.  To evaluate the effect of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength of three different intraoral ceramic repair systems: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Sidharth Jain; Hari Parkash; Sharad Gupta; Akshaya Bhargava
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-03-14

5.  A comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of porcelain and composite using different bonding agents - An in vitro study.

Authors:  Roseline Meshramkar; Suresh Sajjan
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2010-08-05

6.  Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment.

Authors:  Ashish Kalra; Murali S Mohan; E Mahesh Gowda
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

7.  A comparison of shear bond strength of ceramic and resin denture teeth on different acrylic resin bases.

Authors:  Massimo Corsalini; Daniela Di Venere; Francesco Pettini; Gianluca Stefanachi; Santo Catapano; Antonio Boccaccio; Luciano Lamberti; Carmine Pappalettere; Stefano Carossa
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2014-12-29

8.  The Bond Strength of Nanohybrid and Nanoceramic Composites to Feldspathic Porcelain.

Authors:  Hatice Özdemir; Nuran Dinçkal Yanikoglu
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

9.  The effect of silane applied to glass ceramics on surface structure and bonding strength at different temperatures.

Authors:  Tevfik Yavuz; Oguz Eraslan
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  Porcelain repair - Influence of different systems and surface treatments on resin bond strength.

Authors:  Ji-Young Yoo; Hyung-In Yoon; Ji-Man Park; Eun-Jin Park
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 1.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.