Literature DB >> 8393343

Intracomplex electron transfer between ruthenium-65-cytochrome b5 and position-82 variants of yeast iso-1-cytochrome c.

A Willie1, M McLean, R Q Liu, S Hilgen-Willis, A J Saunders, G J Pielak, S G Sligar, B Durham, F Millett.   

Abstract

We tested the idea that the aromatic ring on the invariant residue Phe-82 in cytochrome c acts as an electron-transfer bridge between cytochrome c and cytochrome b5. Ru-65-cyt b5 was prepared by labeling the single sulfhydryl group on T65C cytochrome b5 with [4-(bromomethyl)-4'-methylbipyridine][bis(bipyridine)]ruthenium 2+ as previously described [Willie, A., Stayton, P.S., Sligar, S.G., Durham, B., & Millett, F. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 7237-7242]. Laser excitation of the complex formed between Ru-65-cyt b5 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae iso-1-cytochrome c at low ionic strength results in rapid electron transfer from the excited-state Ru(II*) to the heme group of Ru-65-cyt b5 followed by biphasic electron transfer to the heme group of cytochrome c with rate constants of (1.0 +/- 0.2) x 10(5) s-1 and (2.0 +/- 0.04) x 10(4) s-1. Variants of iso-1-cytochrome c substituted at Phe-82 with Tyr, Gly, Leu, and Ile have fast-phase rate constants of 0.4, 1.9, 2.1, and 2.0 x 10(5) s-1 and slow-phase rate constants of 5.3, 3.5, 2.4, and 2.0 x 10(3) s-1, respectively. Increasing the ionic strength to 50 mM results in single-phase intracomplex electron transfer with rate constants of 3.8, 3.1, 3.0, 5.0, and 4.5 x 10(4) s-1 for the wild-type, Tyr, Gly, Leu, and Ile variants, respectively. These results demonstrate that an aromatic side chain at residue 82 is not needed for rapid electron transfer with cytochrome b5. Furthermore, two conformational forms of the complex are present at low ionic strength with fast and slow electron-transfer rates.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8393343     DOI: 10.1021/bi00080a025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  5 in total

Review 1.  Electron transfer from cytochrome b5 to cytochrome c.

Authors:  B Durham; J L Fairris; M McLean; F Millett; J R Scott; S G Sligar; A Willie
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.945

Review 2.  Experimental and theoretical analysis of the interaction between cytochrome c and cytochrome b5.

Authors:  A G Mauk; M R Mauk; G R Moore; S H Northrup
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.945

3.  Characterization and calculation of a cytochrome c-cytochrome b5 complex using NMR data.

Authors:  Shashank Deep; Sang-Choul Im; Erik R P Zuiderweg; Lucy Waskell
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 4.  Electron transfer between cytochrome c and cytochrome c peroxidase.

Authors:  F Millett; M A Miller; L Geren; B Durham
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.945

5.  Stability of yeast iso-1-ferricytochrome c as a function of pH and temperature.

Authors:  D S Cohen; G J Pielak
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.725

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.