Literature DB >> 838876

Cat cones have rod input: a comparison of the response properties of cones and horizontal cell bodies in the retina of the cat.

R Nelson.   

Abstract

The responses of horizontal cell bodies and cones in the retina of the cat have been studied by means of intracellular recording and Procion dye injection in an isolated, arterially perfused eyecup preparation. Comparison of the hyperpolarizing responses of these units to red and blue stimuli of different intensities indicated that all morphological varieties of horizontal cells and, additionally, cones themselves, had mixed rod and cone input. The rod input into horizontal cell bodies is thus explained on the basis of cone physiology. The half-saturating intensity of 441 nm stimuli for the rod input into cones and horizontal cells was about 400 quanta/mum2/sec and about 160,000 quanta/mum2/sec for the cone input. Little of this difference can be related to the different quantum catching abilities of rods and cones. The spatial properties of horizontal cell bodies and cones have been characterized using stimuli consisting of long slits in conjunction with a continuous cable model. Space constants for horizontal cells ranged from 210 mum to 410 mum, whereas those for cones ranged from 50 mum, or possibly less, to 180 mum. It is argued that horizontal cell bodies of the cat retina form electrical networks, and that the sizes of the receptive fields generated in these networks may be limited by the diameters of the primary and secondary dendrites of horizontal cells. The rod and cone fields of horizontal cell bodies were found to be nearly coextensive in space, arguing against the notion that substantial rod input came from distant, rod-dominated terminal arborizations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 838876     DOI: 10.1002/cne.901720106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  74 in total

1.  An alternative pathway for rod signals in the rodent retina: rod photoreceptors, cone bipolar cells, and the localization of glutamate receptors.

Authors:  I Hack; L Peichl; J H Brandstätter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Fine structure of parvocellular receptive fields in the primate fovea revealed by laser interferometry.

Authors:  M J McMahon; M J Lankheet; P Lennie; D R Williams
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Assessment of local cone on- and off-pathway function using multifocal ERG technique.

Authors:  M Kondo; Y Miyake
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 4.  Soluble guanylate cyclases in the retina.

Authors:  Ari Sitaramayya
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.396

5.  Microcircuits for night vision in mouse retina.

Authors:  Y Tsukamoto; K Morigiwa; M Ueda; P Sterling
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The influence of different retinal subcircuits on the nonlinearity of ganglion cell behavior.

Authors:  Matthias H Hennig; Klaus Funke; Florentin Wörgötter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Modulation of rod photoreceptor output by HCN1 channels is essential for regular mesopic cone vision.

Authors:  Mathias W Seeliger; Arne Brombas; Reto Weiler; Peter Humphries; Gabriel Knop; Naoyuki Tanimoto; Frank Müller
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Rod and cone contribution to adaptation processes in cat retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  E Günther; E Zrenner
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Dopamine D2 receptor-mediated modulation of rod-cone coupling in the Xenopus retina.

Authors:  D Krizaj; R Gábriel; W G Owen; P Witkovsky
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1998-09-07       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Photoreceptor coupling is controlled by connexin 35 phosphorylation in zebrafish retina.

Authors:  Hongyan Li; Alice Z Chuang; John O'Brien
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.