Literature DB >> 2265581

Rod and cone contribution to adaptation processes in cat retinal ganglion cells.

E Günther1, E Zrenner.   

Abstract

Extracellular ganglion cell responses were recorded to investigate mechanisms of light adaptation. Monochromatic test spots (575 nm) were projected onto the receptive field center of off-center cells and superimposed on a steady blue-green Ganzfeld background (Schott Filter BG 28), the strength of which was increased in steps of 0.5 log units to adapt rods. Response vs. log intensity functions were determined over a range of 7 log units of test light irradiance at each background level. At higher adaptation levels response thresholds followed the typical Weber function. Surprisingly at lower adaptation levels the sensitivity of the cell increased by about 0.7 log units, most markedly in a range of 1 log unit of moderate light adaptation when the background was changed from dark to the dimmest detectable background (10(-5) lm/m2). In the dark-adapted state a small off-response of long latency (40-100 ms at 10(2) quanta.s-1.microns-2) is observed at low rod stimulating test light irradiances. A transition to a cone-dominated transient response of 2 to 5 ms duration occurred at high intensities (10(5) quanta.s-1.microns-2). At mesopic levels the two responses seem to cancel each other, rendering a delayed off-response that is probably the result of rod-cone interaction. As in psychophysics, saturation can be observed at very high background intensities (10(6) quanta.s-1 microns-2). These data suggest interactions between rods and cones that determine the sensitivity of cat retinal ganglion cells at low levels of adaptation for suprathreshold stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2265581     DOI: 10.1007/bf00142597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  25 in total

1.  Adaptation of a color-opponent mechanism increases parafoveal sensitivity to luminance flicker.

Authors:  N J Coletta; A J Adams
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Interactions between the rod and the cone pathways in the cat retina.

Authors:  M W Levine; L J Frishman; C Enroth-Cugell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Control of retinal sensitivity. II. Lateral interactions at the outer plexi form layer.

Authors:  F S Werblin
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 4.086

4.  Cat cones have rod input: a comparison of the response properties of cones and horizontal cell bodies in the retina of the cat.

Authors:  R Nelson
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1977-03-01       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  The cone threshold: spatial interactions of rod and cone adapting signals.

Authors:  C F Stromeyer; T L Hill
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Rod-cone interaction in flicker perimetry.

Authors:  K R Alexander; G A Fishman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Rod-cone interaction on large and small backgrounds.

Authors:  S L Buck; W Makous
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Response of cat retinal ganglion cells to moving visual patterns.

Authors:  R W Rodieck; J Stone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Rod influence on cone flicker detection: variation with retinal eccentricity.

Authors:  K R Alexander; G A Fishman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Control of retinal sensitivity. I. Light and dark adaptation of vertebrate rods and cones.

Authors:  R A Normann; F S Werblin
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 4.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.