Literature DB >> 8387506

Evidence for involvement of the voltage-dependent Na+ channel gating in depolarization-induced activation of G-proteins.

M Cohen-Armon1, M Sokolovsky.   

Abstract

Evidence for activation of pertussis-toxin-sensitive G-proteins by membrane depolarization in rat brainstem synaptoneurosomes was recently reported (Cohen-Armon, M., and Sokolovsky, M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 2595-2605; (1991) Neurosci. Lett. 126, 87-90) and is further supported in this study by the observation that the depolarization-induced effect is inhibited when G-proteins are stabilized in the non-activated state with guanosine 5'-O-(2-thiodiphosphate) (GDP beta S), which was introduced into synaptoneurosomes during the process of permeabilization and resealing. In the present study, agents that either keep the voltage-dependent Na+ channel in persistently activated state (while Na+ currents are blocked) or prevent it from activation were used in an attempt to determine whether the voltage-dependent Na+ channels are involved in the depolarization-induced activation of pertussis-toxin-sensitive G-proteins. The main probe employed was the cardiotonic and antiarrhythmic agent DPI, which is a racemic mixture of two enantiomers, one of which (the R enantiomer) reportedly prevents depolarization-induced activation of the Na+ channel while the other (the S enantiomer) inhibits Na+ channel inactivation. The results suggest that while inactivation of the voltage-dependent Na+ channel does not interfere with the putative depolarization-induced activation of G-proteins, membrane depolarization affects G-proteins and the coupled muscarinic receptors only if the voltage-dependent Na+ channels are capable of being activated. Thus, inhibition of the depolarization-induced activation of Na+ channels was accompanied by inhibition of the depolarization-induced activation of pertussis-toxin-sensitive G-proteins and by modifications of both the coupling of G-proteins to muscarinic receptors and the ADP-ribosylation of Go-proteins. These effects could be counteracted by persistent activation of the voltage-dependent Na+ channels (while Na+ current was blocked). Our observations may suggest that the voltage-dependent Na+ channel gating is involved in the depolarization-induced activation of pertussis toxin-sensitive G-proteins and may provide evidence for a possible mechanism of membrane depolarization signal transduction in excitable cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8387506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  7 in total

1.  Stimulation-induced modifications in Go proteins examined in giant fused synaptosomes.

Authors:  Noya Dekel; Leonid Visochek; Yosef Anis; Malka Cohen-Armon
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.444

Review 2.  Molecular mechanisms of go signaling.

Authors:  Meisheng Jiang; Neil S Bajpayee
Journal:  Neurosignals       Date:  2009-02-12

Review 3.  Control of neurotransmitter release: From Ca2+ to voltage dependent G-protein coupled receptors.

Authors:  Itzchak Parnas; Hanna Parnas
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 3.657

4.  Expression and functional analysis of voltage-activated Na+ channels in human prostate cancer cell lines and their contribution to invasion in vitro.

Authors:  M E Laniado; E N Lalani; S P Fraser; J A Grimes; G Bhangal; M B Djamgoz; P D Abel
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Tetrodotoxin-blockable depolarization-activated Na+ currents in a cultured endothelial cell line derived from rat interlobar arter and human umbilical vein.

Authors:  D V Gordienko; H Tsukahara
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.657

6.  The plasma membrane potential and the organization of the actin cytoskeleton of epithelial cells.

Authors:  Silvia Chifflet; Julio A Hernández
Journal:  Int J Cell Biol       Date:  2012-01-23

7.  Voltage affects the dissociation rate constant of the m2 muscarinic receptor.

Authors:  Yair Ben Chaim; Shimrit Bochnik; Itzchak Parnas; Hanna Parnas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.