Literature DB >> 8379802

Frequency and determinants of screening for breast cancer in primary care group practice.

R R Love1, R L Brown, J E Davis, L J Baumann, S A Fontana, L A Sanner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many studies reporting the frequency of breast cancer screening have been based only on physician and patient surveys or on data from quality assurance studies and do not assess the reliability of information obtained from these various sources.
METHODS: To obtain more complete data we studied mammography performed in a 3-year period, 1988 through 1991, in 24 nonacademic primary care group practices by both auditing the medical records and obtaining questionnaire responses from 1819 women aged 53 to 62 years and from their 98 physicians in the nonmetropolitan Midwest.
RESULTS: Medical record data indicated that mammography was performed in all 3 years in 16.7%, in at least two of 3 years in 49.8%, and in at least one of 3 years in 81.7% of women. While patient reports of a family history of breast cancer, health insurance coverage for mammography, and greater annual household income were each significant predictors, a patient report that a clinic staff member had discussed mammography was the strongest predictor of greater frequency of mammography.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study of self-selected physicians and their patients, record-documented mammographic examinations were considerably more frequent than has been reported in some studies, but occurred at rates consistent with quality assurance data for the region. These data suggest that clinic staff initiatives with screening mammography have a large impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8379802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  8 in total

1.  Factors associated with women's adherence to mammography screening guidelines.

Authors:  K A Phillips; K Kerlikowske; L C Baker; S W Chang; M L Brown
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Redesigning primary care processes to improve the offering of mammography. The use of clinic protocols by nonphysicians.

Authors:  B D McCarthy; M U Yood; M B Bolton; E A Boohaker; C H MacWilliam; M J Young
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Impact of the Cancer Risk Intake System on patient-clinician discussions of tamoxifen, genetic counseling, and colonoscopy.

Authors:  Celette Sugg Skinner; Susan M Rawl; Barry K Moser; Adam H Buchanan; Linda L Scott; Victoria L Champion; Joellen M Schildkraut; Giovanni Parmigiani; Shelly Clark; David F Lobach; Lori A Bastian
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Factors influencing adherence to guidelines for screening mammography among women aged 40 years and older.

Authors:  Saleh M M Rahman; Mark B Dignan; Brent J Shelton
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.847

5.  Cancer screening in women: body mass index and adherence to physician recommendations.

Authors:  Jeanne M Ferrante; Ping-Hsin Chen; Benjamin F Crabtree; Daniel Wartenberg
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  The delivery of preventive services in primary care practices according to chronic disease status.

Authors:  S A Fontana; L C Baumann; C Helberg; R R Love
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Chronic disease as a barrier to breast and cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  C I Kiefe; E Funkhouser; M N Fouad; D S May
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Obesity and Cancer Screening according to Race and Gender.

Authors:  Heather Bittner Fagan; Richard Wender; Ronald E Myers; Nicholas Petrelli
Journal:  J Obes       Date:  2011-12-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.