Literature DB >> 837969

The ambiguity of adverse drug reactions.

J Koch-Weser, E M Sellers, R Zacest.   

Abstract

Three clinical pharmacologists independently evaluated 500 untoward clinical events reported by physicians as adverse drug reactions (ADRs). They often disagreed with the reporting physicians and with each other. They judged 14.4-28.2% of the events to be definite, 26.4-38.0% probable, 21.4-31.0% possible and 15.8-28.2% of the events to be definite, 26.4-38.0% probable, 21.4-31.0% possible and 15.8-28.2% unlikely ADRs. In their opinion 19.1-32.4% of the drugs blamed were definitely, 29.8-34.4% probably, 24.9-36.7% possibly and 8.4-14.5% not responsible for the adverse reactions. Evaluators disagreed among themselves about the drug most likely to have been responsible in 36.4% of the events, about ADRs causing hospital admission in 56.8%, about severe ADR morbidity in 55.8%, about ADR prolongation of hospitalization in 67.3% and ADR prolongation of hospitalization in 67.3% and about ADR contribution to death in 71.0%. The divergence of judgements suggests that suspected ADRs are usually ambiguous clinical events, and that incidence, severity, medical consequences and cost of ADRs can only be estimated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 837969     DOI: 10.1007/BF00562895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  8 in total

1.  PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS, PLACEBO REACTIONS, AND "SIDE EFFECTS".

Authors:  D M GREEN
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1964-02       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Adverse drug reactions. A critical review.

Authors:  F E Karch; L Lasagna
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1975-12-22       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Adverse drug reactions-a matter of opinion.

Authors:  F E Karch; C L Smith; B Kerzner; J M Mazzullo; M Weintraub; L Lasagna
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Adverse drug reactions and death. A review of 827 cases.

Authors:  N S Irey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1976-08-09       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Editorial: Fatal reactions to drug therapy.

Authors:  J Koch-Weser
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1974-08-08       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Clinical biostatistics. 28. The biostatistical problems of pharmaceutical surveillance.

Authors:  A R Feinstein
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Adverse nondrug reactions.

Authors:  M M Reidenberg; D T Lowenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1968-09-26       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Factors determining physician reporting of adverse drug reactions. Comparison of 2000 spontaneous reports with surveillance studies at the Massachusetts General Hospital.

Authors:  J Koch-Weser; V W Sidel; R H Sweet; P Kanarek; A E Eaton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1969-01-02       Impact factor: 91.245

  8 in total
  33 in total

Review 1.  Intraspinal steroids: history, efficacy, accidentality, and controversy with review of United States Food and Drug Administration reports.

Authors:  D A Nelson; W M Landau
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Hematologic dyscrasia associated with ticlopidine therapy: evidence for causality.

Authors:  F L Paradiso-Hardy; C M Angelo; K L Lanctôt; E A Cohen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-11-28       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Comparison of three methods (consensual expert judgement, algorithmic and probabilistic approaches) of causality assessment of adverse drug reactions: an assessment using reports made to a French pharmacovigilance centre.

Authors:  Hélène Théophile; Yannick Arimone; Ghada Miremont-Salamé; Nicholas Moore; Annie Fourrier-Réglat; Françoise Haramburu; Bernard Bégaud
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Agreement of expert judgment in causality assessment of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  Yannick Arimone; Bernard Bégaud; Ghada Miremont-Salamé; Annie Fourrier-Réglat; Nicholas Moore; Mathieu Molimard; Françoise Haramburu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-04-13       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 5.  The art and science of risk management: a US research-based industry perspective.

Authors:  Janice K Bush; Wanju S Dai; Gretchen S Dieck; Linda S Hostelley; Thomas Hassall
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  Case reports of suspected adverse drug reactions--systematic literature survey of follow-up.

Authors:  Yoon Kong Loke; Deirdre Price; Sheena Derry; Jeffrey K Aronson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-01-18

Review 7.  Methods for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Taofikat B Agbabiaka; Jelena Savović; Edzard Ernst
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Inter-expert agreement of seven criteria in causality assessment of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  Yannick Arimone; Ghada Miremont-Salamé; Françoise Haramburu; Mathieu Molimard; Nicholas Moore; Annie Fourrier-Réglat; Bernard Bégaud
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Recent developments in computer-assisted diagnosis of putative adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  C A Naranjo; K L Lanctôt
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Comparison of three methods (an updated logistic probabilistic method, the Naranjo and Liverpool algorithms) for the evaluation of routine pharmacovigilance case reports using consensual expert judgement as reference.

Authors:  Hélène Théophile; Manon André; Ghada Miremont-Salamé; Yannick Arimone; Bernard Bégaud
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.