Literature DB >> 15649102

The art and science of risk management: a US research-based industry perspective.

Janice K Bush1, Wanju S Dai, Gretchen S Dieck, Linda S Hostelley, Thomas Hassall.   

Abstract

The research-based pharmaceutical industry in the US strongly supports the concepts of risk management and sees formal risk management as playing a major role in the development of safe medicines for the public, as well as providing a mechanism to ensure that decisions concerning individual drug benefit and risk are made based on scientific evidence. Safe medicines refer to those drugs whose benefits have been found to outweigh their risks when they are used according to the approved labelling. Risk management is the comprehensive and proactive application of scientifically based methodologies to identify, assess, communicate and minimise risk throughout the life cycle of a drug so as to establish and maintain a favourable benefit-risk balance in patients. Although there are certainly a number of global risk management initiatives in place or being undertaken, harmonisation has yet to be achieved. Industry is faced with a variety of different risk management approaches and tools. There is a need to move the focus of risk management from the post-approval arena to earlier in the development process and tools need to be developed to support risk management throughout the lifecycle of a drug. The focus in the US on risk minimalisation strategies will also be an area for methodological development. A key factor in the success of overall risk management is the dialogue between industry and regulators throughout the development, review and marketing of the product. It is through such dialogue that appropriate, efficient and effective risk management strategies will be developed and implemented and the best decisions regarding the safe use of pharmaceutical products will be made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15649102     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200528010-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  46 in total

1.  A novel scheme for the reporting of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  A Clarkson; E Ingleby; I Choonara; P Bryan; P Arlett
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  The UK General Practice Research Database.

Authors:  T Walley; A Mantgani
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-10-11       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Signal generation and clarification: use of case-control data.

Authors:  D W Kaufman; L Rosenberg; A A Mitchell
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  Direct-to-consumer advertising--strengthening our health care system.

Authors:  Alan F Holmer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-02-14       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  The management of adverse drug reactions: from diagnosis to signal.

Authors:  I R Edwards
Journal:  Therapie       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.070

Review 6.  Advances in molecular toxicology-towards understanding idiosyncratic drug toxicity.

Authors:  B K Park; N R Kitteringham; H Powell; M Pirmohamed
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2000-11-16       Impact factor: 4.221

7.  A Bayesian neural network method for adverse drug reaction signal generation.

Authors:  A Bate; M Lindquist; I R Edwards; S Olsson; R Orre; A Lansner; R M De Freitas
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Use of the UK General Practice Research Database for pharmacoepidemiology.

Authors:  L A García Rodríguez; S Pérez Gutthann
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Premarketing studies in the drug approval process: understanding their limitations regarding the assessment of drug safety.

Authors:  T Laughren
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.393

10.  An algorithm for the operational assessment of adverse drug reactions. III. Results of tests among clinicians.

Authors:  J M Leventhal; T A Hutchinson; M S Kramer; A R Feinstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1979-11-02       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacovigilance during the pre-approval phases: an evolving pharmaceutical industry model in response to ICH E2E, CIOMS VI, FDA and EMEA/CHMP risk-management guidelines.

Authors:  Craig G Hartford; Kasia S Petchel; Hani Mickail; Susana Perez-Gutthann; Mary McHale; John M Grana; Paula Marquez
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Risk management policy and black-box warnings: a qualitative analysis of US FDA proceedings.

Authors:  Daniel M Cook; Rama K Gurugubelli; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.