Literature DB >> 8377827

Expression of transcription factor E2F1 induces quiescent cells to enter S phase.

D G Johnson1, J K Schwarz, W D Cress, J R Nevins.   

Abstract

Several lines of evidence implicate the E2F transcription factor as an important component of cell proliferation control. First, E2F binding sites are found in the promoters of genes responsive to proliferation signals and the level of E2F binding activity increases at a time when many of these genes are activated. Second, the tumour suppressor protein Rb, as well as the related p107 protein, complexes with E2F, resulting in an inhibition of E2F transcriptional activity. Third, oncogenic products of the DNA tumour viruses can dissociate these E2F complexes. We provide here direct evidence that E2F is involved in cellular proliferation control. Specifically, we demonstrate that overexpression of the E2F1 complementary DNA can activate DNA synthesis in cells that would otherwise growth-arrest, with an efficiency that is similar to that achieved by the expression of the adenovirus E1A gene. Moreover, microinjection of the E2F1 cDNA into quiescent cells can induce S-phase entry, whereas two E2F1 mutants, which are unable to transactivate the DHFR and TK promoters, are unable to induce S phase. We conclude that the E2F transcription factor plays an important role in progression into S phase and that this probably coincides with its capacity to stimulate transcription.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8377827     DOI: 10.1038/365349a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  297 in total

1.  E2F is required to prevent inappropriate S-phase entry of mammalian cells.

Authors:  S He; B L Cook; B E Deverman; U Weihe; F Zhang; V Prachand; J Zheng; S J Weintraub
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  CDC25A phosphatase is a target of E2F and is required for efficient E2F-induced S phase.

Authors:  E Vigo; H Müller; E Prosperini; G Hateboer; P Cartwright; M C Moroni; K Helin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Involvement of Myc activity in a G(1)/S-promoting mechanism parallel to the pRb/E2F pathway.

Authors:  E Santoni-Rugiu; J Falck; N Mailand; J Bartek; J Lukas
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 4.  Cell cycle regulators: mechanisms and their role in aetiology, prognosis, and treatment of cancer.

Authors:  R J Michalides
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  E2F mediates developmental and cell cycle regulation of ORC1 in Drosophila.

Authors:  M Asano; R P Wharton
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-05-04       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Regulation of Rb and E2F by signal transduction cascades: divergent effects of JNK1 and p38 kinases.

Authors:  S Wang; N Nath; A Minden; S Chellappan
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Regulation of endogenous E2F1 stability by the retinoblastoma family proteins.

Authors:  F Martelli; D M Livingston
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Tossing monkey wrenches into the clock: new ways of treating cancer.

Authors:  J A Lees; R A Weinberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-13       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The molecular chaperone activity of simian virus 40 large T antigen is required to disrupt Rb-E2F family complexes by an ATP-dependent mechanism.

Authors:  C S Sullivan; P Cantalupo; J M Pipas
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Selective induction of E2F1 in response to DNA damage, mediated by ATM-dependent phosphorylation.

Authors:  W C Lin; F T Lin; J R Nevins
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.