Literature DB >> 8371442

Predicting the outcome of unsuccessful prehospital advanced cardiac life support.

A L Kellermann1, B B Hackman, G Somes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if failure to achieve return of spontaneous circulation following prehospital advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) warrants termination of efforts at the scene.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
SETTING: Memphis, Tenn, a city of 610337 people that is served by a fire department-based emergency medical service system. All city ambulances provide ACLS. PATIENTS: Adult victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to heart disease. INTERVENTION: All patients received prehospital ACLS according to the 1986 American Heart Association guidelines. Following prehospital ACLS, all patients were transported to the nearest hospital emergency department whether or not a pulse was restored in the field. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival to hospital admission, survival to hospital discharge, and neurological status at discharge.
RESULTS: Over the 39-month study interval, the Memphis Fire Department treated 1068 victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Three hundred ten of these (29%) had return of spontaneous circulation prior to transport for some period. The remaining 758 patients (71%) never regained a pulse and were transported with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Patients who had return of spontaneous circulation prior to transport were more likely to be admitted (69% vs 7.0%) and far more likely to be discharged alive (26.5% vs 0.4%) than patients who failed to respond to prehospital ACLS. Three patients who survived to hospital discharge despite failure to achieve return of spontaneous circulation prior to emergency medical service transport sustained their cardiac arrest after paramedic arrival. All three were discharged with moderate to severe cerebral disability.
CONCLUSION: Rapid transport of adults who fail to respond to an adequate trial of prehospital ACLS does not result in meaningful rates of survival. In such cases, on-line emergency medical service physicians should authorize paramedics to cease efforts in the field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8371442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  21 in total

Review 1.  [Position paper on "automated external defibrillation" ].

Authors:  H-J Trappe; D Andresen; H-R Arntz; H-J Becker; K Werdan
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-04

2.  [Position paper on "Automatic external defibrillation"].

Authors:  H-J Trappe; D Andresen; H-R Arntz; H-J Becker; K Werdan
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2005-06

Review 3.  [Public access defibrillation. Limited use by trained first responders and laymen].

Authors:  S Maisch; P Friederich; A E Goetz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  [Emergency physician and AutoPulse--a good duo in preclinical emergency services?: case example and report on experience].

Authors:  J-C Schewe; U Heister; A Hoeft; H Krep
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  Targeting mitochondria for resuscitation from cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Iyad M Ayoub; Jeejabai Radhakrishnan; Raúl J Gazmuri
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 6.  [First responder defibrillation in the USA, Europe and Germany--prerequisites, experiences, perspectives].

Authors:  H-J Trappe
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2005-06

7.  A case of survival after cardiac arrest and 3½ hours of resuscitation.

Authors:  Derek M Nusbaum; Scott T Bassett; Igor D Gregoric; Biswajit Kar
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2014-04-01

8.  Treating critical supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Trappe
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2010-04

9.  Recognition of death and termination of cardiac resuscitation attempts by UK ambulance personnel.

Authors:  A S Lockey
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 10.  S-100B and neuron-specific enolase as predictors of neurological outcome in patients after cardiac arrest and return of spontaneous circulation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Koichiro Shinozaki; Shigeto Oda; Tomohito Sadahiro; Masataka Nakamura; Yo Hirayama; Ryuzo Abe; Yoshihisa Tateishi; Noriyuki Hattori; Tadanaga Shimada; Hiroyuki Hirasawa
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.