Literature DB >> 8369541

Speech-evoked cortical potentials in children.

N Kraus1, T McGee, T Carrell, A Sharma, A Micco, T Nicol.   

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were obtained to synthesized speech stimuli in 16 school-aged children (7-11 years) and compared to responses in 10 adults. P1, N1, and P2 event-related potentials were elicited by the phoneme /ga/. The mismatch negativity (MMN) was elicited by variants of /da/ and /ga/, which differ in the onset frequency of the second and third formant transitions. In general, the well-defined N1/P2 complex characteristic of the adult response, was not found in children. Waves P1 and N1 had longer peak latencies in children than in adults. Wave P2 amplitude was smaller in children than in adults. In contrast to the often poorly delineated earlier cortical potentials, the MMN was well defined in children. Significant MMNs were obtained in all subjects tested. MMN magnitude (peak amplitude and area) was significantly larger in the children. No significant differences were found in peak latency and duration of the MMN in children compared to the adult response. Another negative wave occurring at 400 msec was also observed in response to the deviant stimuli. This negative wave occurred at a similar latency in adults and children and was significantly larger and more robust in children. Results support the view that development of ERPs does not involve a hierarchical process with respect to latency. That is, earlier occurring waves do not necessarily mature before later occurring waves. The latencies of P1, N1, and P2 and overall morphology of these waves may provide a measure of maturation of central pathways. The early development of the MMN, its apparent robustness in school-aged children, and its reflection of the processing of acoustic differences in speech stimuli suggest its possible use in the assessment of central auditory function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8369541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  18 in total

1.  A novel EEG paradigm to simultaneously and rapidly assess the functioning of auditory and visual pathways.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Andrew S Kessler; Laurel A Lawyer; David P Corina; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Mismatch negativity: the contribution of differences in the refractoriness of stimulus-specific neuron populations.

Authors:  M D Evstigneeva; A A Aleksandrov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-10-15

3.  Stimulus presentation strategies for eliciting the acoustic change complex: increasing efficiency.

Authors:  Brett A Martin; Arthur Boothroyd; Dassan Ali; Tiffany Leach-Berth
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Children show hemispheric differences in the basic auditory response properties.

Authors:  Tiina Parviainen; Päivi Helenius; Riitta Salmelin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Acoustically evoked auditory change complex in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder: a potential objective tool for identifying cochlear implant candidates.

Authors:  Shuman He; John H Grose; Holly F B Teagle; Jennifer Woodard; Lisa R Park; Debora R Hatch; Patricia Roush; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  The Acoustic Change Complex in Young Children with Hearing Loss: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Amy S Martinez; Laurie S Eisenberg; Arthur Boothroyd
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2013

7.  Speech perception in the child brain: cortical timing and its relevance to literacy acquisition.

Authors:  Tiina Parviainen; Päivi Helenius; Elisa Poskiparta; Pekka Niemi; Riitta Salmelin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Gap detection measured with electrically evoked auditory event-related potentials and speech-perception abilities in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Shuman He; John H Grose; Holly F B Teagle; Jennifer Woodard; Lisa R Park; Debora R Hatch; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Age-related dissociation of sensory and decision-based auditory motion processing.

Authors:  Alexandra A Ludwig; Rudolf Rübsamen; Gerd J Dörrscheidt; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Is auditory discrimination mature by middle childhood? A study using time-frequency analysis of mismatch responses from 7 years to adulthood.

Authors:  Dorothy V M Bishop; Mervyn J Hardiman; Johanna G Barry
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.