Literature DB >> 8368528

Electrical field-flow fractionation in particle separation. 1. Monodisperse standards.

K D Caldwell1, Y S Gao.   

Abstract

In its original implementation, electrical field-flow fractionation (EFFF) was carried out in membrane-walled channels with the electrodes placed externally to the flow channel. The poor separation efficiency of this system left the technique largely unattended for about two decades. In the present study, we describe a new and simple approach to EFFF, which demonstrates the technique's ability to carry out rapid, high-resolution separations of colloidal samples in aqueous suspensions. The present channels are bounded by the smooth and rigid graphite electrodes which allow for the application of small voltages, typically less than 2 V, across the thin (178 microns) separation space defined by a Mylar spacer. Although this arrangement generates nominal fields of the order of 100 V/cm, polarization of the electrodes considerably reduces the effective field across the bulk of the channel to less than 1% of the nominal value. Nevertheless, under conditions of low ionic strength the system is shown to retain and separate polystyrene (PS) latex standards with sizes ranging from 60 to 10,000 nm. For small particles of comparable zeta-potential, separating in the "normal" mode of EFFF, the size selectivity Sd, is approximately 0.7. As with other FFF techniques, EFFF displays a transition from "normal" to "steric" behavior; the critical diameter for this transition is highly dependent on ionic strength, with values ranging from approximately 500 nm in deionized water to approximately 1200 nm in 133 microM aqueous NaCl under an applied voltage of 1.37 V and a flow of 1 mL/min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8368528     DOI: 10.1021/ac00061a021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  8 in total

1.  Zeta-potential Analyses using Micro Electrical Field Flow Fractionation with Fluorescent Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Moon-Hwan Chang; Dosi Dosev; Ian M Kennedy
Journal:  Sens Actuators B Chem       Date:  2007-06-10       Impact factor: 7.460

2.  Continuous size-based separation of microparticles in a microchannel with symmetric sharp corner structures.

Authors:  Liang-Liang Fan; Xu-Kun He; Yu Han; Li Du; Liang Zhao; Jiang Zhe
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  Separation of polystyrene microbeads using dielectrophoretic/gravitational field-flow-fractionation.

Authors:  X B Wang; J Vykoukal; F F Becker; P R Gascoyne
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Development of a membrane-less dynamic field gradient focusing device for the separation of low-molecular-weight molecules.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Burke; Colin D Smith; Cornelius F Ivory
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 5.  Magnetic nanoparticle drug carriers and their study by quadrupole magnetic field-flow fractionation.

Authors:  P Stephen Williams; Francesca Carpino; Maciej Zborowski
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Experiment, theory, and simulation of a flow-electrical-split flow thin particle separation device.

Authors:  Kevin Petersen; Farhad Shiri; Tonguc Onur Tasci; Himanshu Sant; Joshua Hood; Bruce Gale
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 4.759

7.  Biased cyclical electrical field-flow fractionation for separation of submicron particles.

Authors:  Mathuros Ornthai; Atitaya Siripinyanond; Bruce K Gale
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 8.  Characterizing dispersion in microfluidic channels.

Authors:  Subhra Datta; Sandip Ghosal
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 6.799

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.