Literature DB >> 8367920

Goserelin acetate and flutamide versus bilateral orchiectomy: a phase III EORTC trial (30853). EORTC GU Group and EORTC Data Center.

L J Denis1, J L Carnelro de Moura, A Bono, R Sylvester, P Whelan, D Newling, M Depauw.   

Abstract

Maximal androgen blockade (MAB), the eradication of the effects of adrenal androgens on prostate cancer cells after castration, has been used with differing success in the treatment of prostatic carcinoma. The aim of this randomized phase III study was to compare the efficacy and side effects of bilateral orchiectomy versus a combination of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRH-A) depot formulation, goserelin acetate (3.6 mg s.c. once every four weeks), and flutamide (250 mg three times daily), in patients with metastatic cancer. Treatment usually continued until disease progression (or for a minimum of three months). Efficacy was assessed by response, time to disease progression, and duration of survival. Clinical evaluations, standard laboratory tests, and imaging examinations were carried out regularly. A total of 327 patients were entered in this study. There was a difference in response only for prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) with a more frequent decrease of the serum values to normal in the serum in patients assigned to MAB treatment. The MAB treatment, however, proved significantly better for time to subjective progression, time to objective progression, time to first (subjective and objective) progression, and duration of survival. The most frequent side effects for both treatments included hot flushes and gynecomastia. In conclusion, significant time to progression and survival benefits are achieved by adding flutamide to an LHRH-A regimen, probably improving the quality of life of patients with metastatic cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8367920     DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(93)90634-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  22 in total

1.  Androgen deprivation and other treatments for advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  M K Brawer; E D Crawford; F Labrie; A Mendoza-Valdes; P D Miller; D P Petrylak
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2001

2.  The current status of adjuvant hormonal therapy combined with radiation therapy for localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  J Armstrong
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1998 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 3.  Evaluation of quality of life for diverse patient populations.

Authors:  K R Yabroff; B P Linas; K Schulman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 4.  Endocrine and adrenergic pharmacological intervention in diseases of the prostate.

Authors:  A Rane
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of the antiandrogens and their efficacy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  C Mahler; J Verhelst; L Denis
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Patient-Clinician choice in palliation of metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  A V Kaisary
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 7.  Concept and viability of androgen annihilation for advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  James L Mohler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Goserelin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  R N Brogden; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Maximal androgen blockade for advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rajiv Paul Mukha; Santosh Kumar; N S Kekre
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar

Review 10.  Experiences with doxo/epirubicin and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in prostatic cancer.

Authors:  C Anderström
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.