Literature DB >> 8367768

Mechanics of interbody spinal fusion. Analysis of critical bone graft area.

R F Closkey1, J R Parsons, C K Lee, M F Blacksin, M C Zimmerman.   

Abstract

Bone graft subsidence is a serious complication of interbody spinal fusion. In this study, 66 mechanical tests were performed on 35 thoracic vertebral bodies to investigate the in situ mechanics of interbody spinal fusion. The relationships among trabecular bone density, bone strength, and size of bone graft area were analyzed. All vertebral bodies were scanned by quantitative computer tomography (QCT) to determine their bone density before mechanical testing. The decorticated trabecular beds of the vertebral bodies, void of all posterior elements, were loaded in a manner similar to that which occurs after surgical interbody fusion. That is, rectangular blocks of polymethylmethacrylate, representing bone grafts, were used to transfer controlled compressive loads to the decorticated vertebral trabecular surface. Both destructive and nondestructive tests were performed. The relationship between QCT bone density and trabecular bone strength was related by a power function, and, on average, the bone density and trabecular bone strength were 0.137 g/cm3 and 3.97 MPa, respectively. Eighty percent of the vertebral bodies with graft covering 25% of the total end plate area or less failed at loads less than 600 N, while 88% of the vertebral bodies with 30% or greater covered were able to carry a load greater than 600 N. The results suggest that the intrinsic behavior of trabecular bone loaded within the vertebral body is little different from the behavior of the whole body, that QCT bone density is indicative of bone strength, and that interbody graft area should be significantly greater than 30% of the total end plate area to provide a margin of safety.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8367768     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199306150-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  37 in total

1.  The importance of the endplate for interbody cages in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Stephen J Ferguson; Lutz P Nolte; Tracy E Orr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Effect of TLIF Cage Placement on In Vivo Kinematics.

Authors:  Alejandro D Castellvi; Shankar K Thampi; Daniel J Cook; Matthew S Yeager; Yuan Yao; Qing Zou; Donald M Whiting; Michael Y Oh; Edward R Prostko; Boyle C Cheng
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

3.  Advanced Multi-Axis Spine Testing: Clinical Relevance and Research Recommendations.

Authors:  Timothy P Holsgrove; Nikhil R Nayak; William C Welch; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

Review 4.  Rational decision making in a wide scenario of different minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion approaches and devices.

Authors:  Luiz Pimenta; Antoine Tohmeh; David Jones; Rodrigo Amaral; Luis Marchi; Leonardo Oliveira; Bruce C Pittman; Hyun Bae
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03

5.  Primary stability of anterior lumbar stabilization: interdependence of implant type and endplate retention or removal.

Authors:  Christian H Flamme; Nadine von der Heide; Caroline Heymann; Christof Hurschler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  [An improved vertebral body replacement for the thoracolumbar spine. A biomechanical in vitro test on human lumbar vertebral bodies].

Authors:  M Reinhold; W Schmölz; F Canto; D Krappinger; M Blauth; C Knop
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  [Effects of a new anatomical adaptive titanium mesh cage on supportive load at the cervical endplate: a morphological and biomechanical study].

Authors:  Teng Lu; Zhongyang Gao; Xijing He; Jialiang Li; Ning Liu; Hui Liang; Yibin Wang; Zhijing Wen; Ting Zhang; Dong Wang; Haopeng Li
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-04-30

8.  Correlation of cervical endplate strength with CT measured subchondral bone density.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Ordway; Yen-Mou Lu; Xingkai Zhang; Chin-Chang Cheng; Huang Fang; Amir H Fayyazi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The influence of cage positioning and cage type on cage migration and fusion rates in patients with monosegmental posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fixation.

Authors:  Alexander Abbushi; Mario Cabraja; Ulrich-Wilhelm Thomale; Christian Woiciechowsky; Stefan Nikolaus Kroppenstedt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Current Concepts of Contemporary Expandable Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Designs, Part 2: Feasibility Assessment of an Endplate Conforming Bidirectional Expandable Interbody Cage.

Authors:  Boyle C Cheng; Isaac Swink; Rachelle Yusufbekov; Michele Birgelen; Lisa Ferrara; Domagoj Coric
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.