Literature DB >> 8362317

An early comparative analysis of the use of fibular allograft versus autologous iliac crest graft for interbody fusion after anterior cervical discectomy.

W F Young1, R H Rosenwasser.   

Abstract

During a 2-year period (1988-1989), 23 cases of anterior cervical discectomy were performed with cadaveric fibular allograft instead of autologous iliac crest graft. The mean age of the patients was 35 years. There were 10 men and 13 women. In most cases, a one-level fusion was performed at the C5-6 level. The Smith-Robinson technique was used for discectomy and fusion, for both one- and two-level fusions. Evidence of radiographic fusion was achieved in 92% of the cases. Twenty-five cases of anterior cervical discectomy in which autologous iliac crest graft was used (1987-1988) were examined retrospectively for comparison. The mean duration of hospital stay was less in the allograft group (5.4 days vs. 7.25 days). In addition, postoperative pain was less in the allograft group because the allograft group did not have pain from the donor site. In conclusion, the use of fibular allograft for interbody fusion after anterior cervical discectomy can be performed with acceptable rates of fusion and less postoperative pain, as compared to the use of autologous iliac crest graft.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8362317     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199307000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  20 in total

1.  Fibular allograft after anterior cervical corpectomy: long term follow-up.

Authors:  Brodie E McKoy; Jeffrey K Wingate; Steven C Poletti; Donald R Johnson; Mark D Stanley; John A Glaser
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2002

2.  Comparison of the biomechanical stability of dense cancellous allograft with tricortical iliac autograft and fibular allograft for cervical interbody fusion.

Authors:  Stephen I Ryu; Jesse T Lim; Sung-Min Kim; Josemaria Paterno; Rafer Willenberg; Daniel H Kim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Anterior cervical allograft arthrodesis and instrumentation: multilevel interbody grafting or strut graft reconstruction.

Authors:  M L Swank; G L Lowery; A L Bhat; R F McDonough
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  An update on bone substitutes for spinal fusion.

Authors:  Masashi Miyazaki; Hiroshi Tsumura; Jeffrey C Wang; Ahmet Alanay
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A prospective randomized comparison of PEEK cage containing calcium sulphate or demineralized bone matrix with autograft in anterior cervical interbody fusion.

Authors:  Youzhuan Xie; Hua Li; Junjie Yuan; Lingjie Fu; Jianwei Yang; Pu Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  An early comparative analysis of the use of autograft versus allograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Sang Yong Kim; Ki Seok Park; Sung Sam Jung; Seong Young Chung; Seong Mim Kim; Moon Sun Park; Han Kyu Kim
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2012-09-30

7.  Diagnosing cervical fusion: a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  Nanin Sethi; James Devney; Holly L Steiner; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2008-12-31

8.  Iliac crest reconstruction to reduce donor-site morbidity: technical note.

Authors:  Joseph Richard Dusseldorp; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the surgical treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective, randomized, control study with over 7-year follow-up.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Xinwei Wang; Xuhua Lu; Lili Yang; Haisong Yang; Wen Yuan; Deyu Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Fibular allograft and anterior plating for dislocations/fractures of the cervical spine.

Authors:  A Ramnarain; S Govender
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.