Literature DB >> 8361322

Insertional trauma of multichannel cochlear implants.

D B Welling1, R Hinojosa, B J Gantz, J T Lee.   

Abstract

Insertional trauma to the cochlea from three different multichannel cochlear implant electrodes was evaluated in a single-blind controlled study in fresh human temporal bones. Sixteen fresh human temporal bones were implanted with one of three types of multichannel electrodes (Symbion/InnerAid, Cochlear/Nucleus, or Storz/UCSF). Seven temporal bones were used as controls where a cochleostomy only was created. The temporal bones were evaluated histologically and cochlear histograms of the trauma were created. Although the three electrode designs caused damage which was unlikely to hinder implant performance, a distinct pattern of trauma was seen with each of the three electrode types. The least traumatic of the three electrode designs in this study was the Nucleus type. The degree of insertional trauma may be relevant to changing indications for insertion of cochlear implants as well as for patients with device failure who require reimplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8361322     DOI: 10.1288/00005537-199309000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  14 in total

1.  [Vestibular dysfunction after cochlear implant in adults].

Authors:  F Holinski; F Elhajzein; G Scholz; B Sedlmaier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Factors associated with incomplete insertion of electrodes in cochlear implant surgery: a histopathologic study.

Authors:  Joonhan Lee; Joseph B Nadol; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 3.  Soft cochlear implantation: rationale for the surgical approach.

Authors:  David R Friedland; Christina Runge-Samuelson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

4.  Considerations for design of future cochlear implant electrode arrays: electrode array stiffness, size, and depth of insertion.

Authors:  Stephen J Rebscher; Alexander Hetherington; Ben Bonham; Peter Wardrop; David Whinney; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

5.  Micro-CT scan, electron microscopy and optical microscopy study of insertional traumas of cochlear implants.

Authors:  Alexia Le Breton; Franck Jegoux; Paul Pilet; Benoit Godey
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Incomplete and false tract insertions in cochlear implantation: retrospective review of surgical and auditory outcomes.

Authors:  Ashish Vashishth; Andrea Fulcheri; Maurizio Guida; Antonio Caruso; Mario Sanna
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  Cochlear Implants and Children with Vestibular Impairments.

Authors:  Sharon L Cushing; Blake C Papsin
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-07-20

8.  Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Finley; Timothy A Holden; Laura K Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Richard A Chole; Gail J Neely; Timothy E Hullar; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 9.  The cochlear implant: historical aspects and future prospects.

Authors:  Adrien A Eshraghi; Ronen Nazarian; Fred F Telischi; Suhrud M Rajguru; Eric Truy; Chhavi Gupta
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 2.064

10.  Modiolus-hugging intracochlear electrode array with shape memory alloy.

Authors:  Kyou Sik Min; Sang Beom Jun; Yoon Seob Lim; Se-Ik Park; Sung June Kim
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.