Literature DB >> 8359645

Effect of crural myotomy on the incidence and mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux in cats.

R K Mittal1, B Sivri, B D Schirmer, K J Heine.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) pressure is the major barrier to gastroesophageal reflux. Recent studies suggest that contraction of the crural diaphragm increases esophagogastric junction pressure. Whether this increase in EGJ pressure is important in the prevention of gastroesophageal reflux is not known. Our aim in this study was to determine the effects of crural myotomy on the occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux.
METHODS: The spontaneous and stress gastroesophageal reflux before and after a surgical crural myotomy in four cats was studied. Spontaneous gastroesophageal reflux was recorded in the awake cats through a pH probe, placed via an esophagostomy, for periods of 12-24 hours. Stress reflux was studied during periods of airway obstruction and abdominal compression in anesthetized animals using the technique of simultaneous esophageal manometry and pH monitoring.
RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the frequency of spontaneous acid reflux after crural myotomy. In anesthetized animals, there was an increase in the EGJ pressure during airway obstruction, which was abolished by a crural myotomy. Abdominal compression caused a reflex contraction at the EGJ that was not affected by crural myotomy. The crural myotomy resulted in a significant increase in the frequency of acid reflux during airway obstruction but not during abdominal compression.
CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that the crural diaphragm is important in the prevention of gastroesophageal reflux and its dysfunction leads to an increased incidence of gastroesophageal reflux.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8359645     DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(93)90891-f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  6 in total

1.  Architecture and function of the gastroesophageal barrier in the piglet.

Authors:  Y Vicente; C Da Rocha; J Yu; G Hernandez-Peredo; L Martinez; B Pérez-Mies; J A Tovar
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Mean pressure obtained by modified rapid pull-through technique used to assess lower esophageal sphincter function.

Authors:  P Alonso; E Estévez; C Aba; B González-Conde; J Yáñez; J L Vázquez-Iglesias
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Gastroesophageal reflux after combined lower esophageal sphincter and diaphragmatic crural sling inactivation in the rat.

Authors:  S Montedonico; J A Diez-Pardo; J A Tovar
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  A comparative study of esophageal and anorectal motility in myotonic dystrophy.

Authors:  I Lecointe-Besancon; F Leroy; G Devroede; M Chevrollier; F Lebeurier; P Congard; P Arhan
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  The diaphragm: two physiological muscles in one.

Authors:  Mark Pickering; James F X Jones
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Pharmacological dissection of the human gastro-oesophageal segment into three sphincteric components.

Authors:  James G Brasseur; Rhys Ulerich; Qing Dai; Dalipkumar K Patel; Ahmed M S Soliman; Larry S Miller
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 5.182

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.