Literature DB >> 8359312

Data-derived safety factors for the evaluation of food additives and environmental contaminants.

A G Renwick1.   

Abstract

A safety factor of 100-fold is commonly applied to animal data to derive the acceptable daily intake (ADI) of food additives; other factors have been used in some cases and higher values are used more frequently for determining the tolerable daily intake (TDI) of environmental chemicals. The 100-fold factor is considered to represent the product of a 10-fold factor to allow for species differences between the test animal and humans and a 10-fold factor to allow for inter-individual differences. A scheme is proposed whereby data relevant to the safety assessment of a compound, e.g. species differences in toxicokinetics, can contribute quantitatively to the safety factor and therefore to the ADI or TDI. For this to be possible, it is necessary to subdivide each of the 10-fold factors into two separate factors to allow for differences in toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics. For any compound, data on one particular aspect may be used to derive a specific data-derived factor for that aspect. The overall safety factor will then be calculated as the product of the known data-derived factor(s) and default values for the remaining unknown factors. In this way the derivation of the safety factor would be clearly defined and the potential impact of additional data on other aspects identified. Additional safety factors (over and above the 100-fold or overall data-derived factor) are also proposed to allow for the nature or severity of the toxicity and the adequacy of the database. These factors are consistent with previous evaluations and will allow the logical derivation of factors greater than either 100 or the appropriate data-derived factor. These additional factors will be of greatest value in the derivation of safety factors for the calculation of the TDIs of environmental contaminants but may also be applied if necessary to the safety assessment of food additives. In such cases the rationale and logic for a safety factor in excess of 100 will be clearly defined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8359312     DOI: 10.1080/02652039309374152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Addit Contam        ISSN: 0265-203X


  13 in total

1.  Effects of flavor enhancers on the survival and behavior of the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).

Authors:  Yuting Huang; Siqi Chen; Zhiqiang Li; Lei Wang; Yijuan Xu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) on testing and interpretation of comparative in vitro metabolism studies.

Authors:  Antonio F Hernandez-Jerez; Paulien Adriaanse; Annette Aldrich; Philippe Berny; Tamara Coja; Sabine Duquesne; Andreas Focks; Marina Marinovich; Maurice Millet; Olavi Pelkonen; Silvia Pieper; Aaldrik Tiktak; Christopher J Topping; Anneli Widenfalk; Martin Wilks; Gerrit Wolterink; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Jochem Louisse; Serge Rudaz; Emanuela Testai; Alfonso Lostia; Jean-Lou Dorne; Juan Manuel Parra Morte
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-12-23

Review 3.  Model systems and organisms for addressing inter- and intra-species variability in risk assessment.

Authors:  Ivan Rusyn; Weihsueh A Chiu; Fred A Wright
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  Transport and dynamics of toxic pollutants in the natural environment and their effect on human health: research gaps and challenge.

Authors:  Andrew Hursthouse; George Kowalczyk
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 5.  Evaluating noncancer effects of trichloroethylene: dosimetry, mode of action, and risk assessment.

Authors:  H A Barton; H J Clewell
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  The Scientific Basis of Uncertainty Factors Used in Setting Occupational Exposure Limits.

Authors:  D A Dankovic; B D Naumann; A Maier; M L Dourson; L S Levy
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 7.  Evaluation of the experimental basis for assessment factors to protect individuals with asthma from health effects during short-term exposure to airborne chemicals.

Authors:  Mia K V Johansson; Gunnar Johanson; Mattias Öberg
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 8.  Dispelling urban myths about default uncertainty factors in chemical risk assessment--sufficient protection against mixture effects?

Authors:  Olwenn V Martin; Scholze Martin; Andreas Kortenkamp
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 9.  Advancing human health risk assessment: integrating recent advisory committee recommendations.

Authors:  Michael Dourson; Richard A Becker; Lynne T Haber; Lynn H Pottenger; Tiffany Bredfeldt; Penelope A Fenner-Crisp
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 10.  Risk assessment of shellfish toxins.

Authors:  Rex Munday; John Reeve
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 4.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.