Literature DB >> 8357111

The prevalence of deep venous thrombosis in patients with suspected paradoxical embolism.

C Stöllberger1, J Slany, I Schuster, H Leitner, W B Winkler, R Karnik.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of venous thrombosis in patients with suspected paradoxical embolism.
DESIGN: Observational study. PATIENTS: Two hundred sixty-four patients with clinically suspected embolic events underwent contrast transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation. Forty-nine patients (24 women, 25 men) had a patent foramen ovale. Forty-one patients had acute stroke, and 8 had acute limb ischemia.
SETTING: Echocardiography laboratory of a community hospital. MEASUREMENTS: The presence of a patent foramen ovale was assessed by transesophageal contrast echocardiography. Forty-two patients had venographic evaluation of the lower-extremity venous system.
RESULTS: Venous thrombosis was clinically suspected in 6 patients and documented in 24 of the 42 patients with patent foramen ovale who underwent venographic study (57%; 95% Cl, 41% to 72%). Venous thrombosis was confined to calf or popliteal veins in 15 cases. Fifteen of 17 patients who had venographic evaluation within 7 days of the index event had thrombosis compared with 9 of 25 patients who had later evaluations (P = 0.001). More patients with venous thrombosis than without venous thrombosis had a history of previous thromboembolism (13 of 24 compared with 1 of 18 [corrected], respectively; P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: When a patent foramen ovale is detected in a patient with embolism, occult leg vein thrombosis is frequently present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8357111     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-6-199309150-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  19 in total

1.  Patent foramen ovale and stroke: Should PFOs be closed in otherwise cryptogenic stroke?

Authors:  David A Carpenter; Andria L Ford; Jin-Moo Lee
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in the detection of venous to arterial shunting in acute stroke and transient ischaemic attacks.

Authors:  M Yeung; K A Khan; A Shuaib
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Central venous catheter thrombosis complicated by paradoxical embolism in a patient with diabetic ketoacidosis and respiratory failure.

Authors:  John A Batsis; Iasmina M Craici; David A Froehling
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 4.  Cryptogenic stroke in patients with patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.113

5.  Patent foramen ovale and stroke: prognosis and treatment in young adults.

Authors:  Steven C Cramer
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 6.  Patent foramen ovale and stroke.

Authors:  Shunichi Homma; Marco R Di Tullio
Journal:  J Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Patent foramen ovale: the never-ending story.

Authors:  Gérald Devuyst; Julien Bogousslavsky
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2005-07

8.  Cryptogenic stroke-the appropriate diagnostic evaluation.

Authors:  Hardik Amin; David M Greer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-01

9.  Cerebral microembolism during transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  J Ferrari; H Baumgartner; S Tentschert; V Dorda; W Lang; A Willfort-Ehringer; P Probst; W Lalouschek
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 10.  Patent foramen ovale and stroke: what should be done?

Authors:  Marco R Di Tullio; Shunichi Homma
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.