Literature DB >> 8354373

Contraceptive efficacy of the diaphragm, the sponge and the cervical cap.

J Trussell1, J Strickler, B Vaughan.   

Abstract

A reanalysis of data from two clinical studies--in which 1,439 women were randomly assigned to use either the contraceptive sponge or the diaphragm and 1,394 women were randomly assigned to use either the cervical cap or the diaphragm--found first-year probabilities of failure during typical use of 17% for the sponge, 18% for the cervical cap and 13-17% for the diaphragm. The first-year probabilities of failure during perfect use are 11-12% for the sponge, 10-13% for the cervical cap and 4-8% for the diaphragm. The probability of failure during perfect use is significantly higher among women who have given birth than among those who have not for users of the sponge (19-21% vs. 9-10%) and users of the cervical cap (26-27% vs. 8-10%), but not for users of the diaphragm.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Barrier Methods; Behavior; Cervical Cap; Comparative Studies; Contraception; Contraception Failure; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive Effectiveness; Contraceptive Methods; Contraceptive Usage; Developed Countries; Family And Household; Family Characteristics; Family Planning; Family Relationships; Mothers; North America; Northern America; Parents; Research Report; Spermicidal Contraceptive Agents; Studies; United States; Use-effectiveness; User Compliance; Vaginal Barrier Methods; Vaginal Diaphragm; Vaginal Sponge

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8354373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect        ISSN: 0014-7354


  5 in total

Review 1.  Contraceptive failure in the United States.

Authors:  James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Young men's risk behaviors for HIV infection and sexually transmitted diseases, 1988 through 1991.

Authors:  L Ku; F L Sonenstein; J H Pleck
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Understanding contraceptive failure.

Authors:  James Trussell
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 5.237

Review 4.  Reversible contraception update: the importance of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Renee E Mestad; Jessica Kenerson; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 5.  Cervical cap versus diaphragm for contraception.

Authors:  M F Gallo; D A Grimes; K F Schulz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.