Literature DB >> 8351848

Movement direction analysers: independence and bandwidth.

J E Raymond1.   

Abstract

Opponent, or ratio, models of movement direction perception propose that pairs of analysers, sensitive to opposite directions, are linked in an opponent fashion. Alternatively, distribution models posit independence of movement direction analysers. To investigate analyser independence, a direction-selective adaptation experiment was conducted in which motion coherence thresholds for random-dot apparent motion stimuli were measured for upward, downward, leftward and rightward motion with and without prior adaptation to rightward motion. Coherence thresholds for rightward motion were elevated on average by 0.64 log units after adaptation. Thresholds for motion in the other directions remained unchanged. Since opponent models predict enhanced sensitivity after adaptation for the direction opposite that of adaptation, these results suggest that movement direction analysers operate independently. In a second experiment subjects adapted to a bidirectional stimulus containing an equal number of leftward and rightward moving dots. Leftward and rightward coherence thresholds were elevated even though no motion aftereffects were produced. A third experiment in which coherence thresholds for test directions within a narrow range were measured with and without prior adaptation to motion in the direction of the range's mean showed that threshold elevation was maximal when test and adaptation direction were matched and fell off as the difference in adaptation and test direction increased. The resulting functions indicate that the bandwidth of movement direction analysers is between +/- 35 and +/- 40 deg, a value consistent with reported mean directional tuning functions of movement sensitive units in the middle temporal area but smaller than previously reported psychophysical values.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8351848     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90196-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

1.  Isolating motion responses in visual evoked potentials by preadapting flicker-sensitive mechanisms.

Authors:  J Peter Maurer; Michael Bach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Cortical pooling algorithms for judging global motion direction.

Authors:  Ben S Webb; Timothy Ledgeway; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Diminished visual motion priming in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Daniel Norton; Yue Chen
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Neural computations governing spatiotemporal pooling of visual motion signals in humans.

Authors:  Ben S Webb; Timothy Ledgeway; Francesca Rocchi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Timing of surgery for infantile esotropia: sensory and motor outcomes.

Authors:  Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.882

6.  Motions add, orientations don't, in the human visual system.

Authors:  Alan W Freeman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Testing neuronal accounts of anisotropic motion perception with computational modelling.

Authors:  William Wong; Nicholas Seow Chiang Price
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.