Literature DB >> 8350167

Binocular enhancement of visual acuity.

R Cagenello1, A Arditi, D L Halpern.   

Abstract

Using a computerized test system, we compared binocular and monocular visual optotype acuity, varying both contrast and contrast disparity between the two eyes. When contrast was the same in the two eyes, binocular acuity was better than best monocular acuity by an average of 0.045 log minimum angle of resolution, or 11%. When contrast differed in the two eyes, binocular acuity in most but not all cases was still better than the monocular acuity of the eye that received the higher contrast. This binocular advantage became smaller but remained significant as contrast disparity became larger. These results are most simply explained by threshold contrast summation of high-spatial-frequency letter components.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8350167     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.10.001841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  24 in total

1.  A utility analysis correlation with visual acuity: methodologies and vision in the better and poorer eyes.

Authors:  M M Brown; G C Brown; S Sharma; A F Smith; J Landy
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Binocular summation for reflexive eye movements.

Authors:  Christian Quaia; Lance M Optican; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The dynamics of practice effects in an optotype acuity task.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich; Katja Krüger; Michael Bach
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Binocular inhibition in strabismic patients is associated with diminished quality of life.

Authors:  Anika K Tandon; Federico G Velez; Sherwin J Isenberg; Joseph L Demer; Stacy L Pineles
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 1.220

5.  An assessment of the new generation three-dimensional high definition laparoscopic vision system on surgical skills: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Taner A Usta; Aysel Ozkaynak; Ebru Kovalak; Erdinc Ergul; M Murat Naki; Erdal Kaya
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Correction of refractive errors in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) involved in visual research.

Authors:  Jude F Mitchell; Chantal J Boisvert; Jon D Reuter; John H Reynolds; Mathias Leblanc
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 0.982

7.  [First results with a new aberration correcting bifocal intraocular lens].

Authors:  H Kaymak; U Mester
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Contrast sensitivity with bifocal intraocular lenses is halved, as measured with the Freiburg Vision Test (FrACT), yet patients are happy.

Authors:  Alexandra Anton; Daniel Böhringer; Michael Bach; Thomas Reinhard; Florian Birnbaum
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Inter-ocular contrast normalization in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Farshad Moradi; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Out of sight, out of mind? Relations between visual acuity and cognition.

Authors:  Claire G La Fleur; Timothy A Salthouse
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.