Literature DB >> 8347749

Comparison of early and late respondents to a postal health survey questionnaire.

A Paganini-Hill1, G Hsu, A Chao, R K Ross.   

Abstract

We mailed a health survey to the 18,408 residents of a California retirement community and compared the 11,550 respondents on a number of characteristics by time of response. Early respondents were more likely to be the "worried well," that is, healthy individuals who see their doctor regularly, receive disease detection screening, and follow healthful life-style practices. Late respondents tended to answer questions regarding their mental function and emotional status more negatively. Early and late respondents did not differ in the rates of death or hospitalization during the first 5 years of the study; nonrespondents had a higher incidence of hospitalization than respondents in year 1 and higher death rates in the first 3 years, but not thereafter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8347749     DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199307000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  25 in total

1.  Assessing non-response to a mailed health survey including self-collection of biological material.

Authors:  Anneli Uusküla; Mart Kals; Louise-Anne McNutt
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.367

2.  National health surveys by mail or home interview: effects on response.

Authors:  H S Picavet
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Are lower response rates hazardous to your health survey? An analysis of three state telephone health surveys.

Authors:  Michael Davern; Donna McAlpine; Timothy J Beebe; Jeanette Ziegenfuss; Todd Rockwood; Kathleen Thiede Call
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Cluster Analysis Demonstrates the Need to Individualize Care for Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Belle H de Rooij; Elyse R Park; Giselle K Perez; Julia Rabin; Katharine M Quain; Don S Dizon; Kathryn E Post; Garrett M Chinn; Allison L McDonough; Rachel B Jimenez; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse; Jeffrey Peppercorn
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-05-08

5.  Patterns of unit and item nonresponse in the CAHPS Hospital Survey.

Authors:  Marc N Elliott; Carol Edwards; January Angeles; Katrin Hambarsoomians; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Evaluation of non-response bias in mental health determinants and outcomes in a large sample of pre-adolescents.

Authors:  Andrea F de Winter; Albertine J Oldehinkel; René Veenstra; J Agnes Brunnekreef; Frank C Verhulst; Johan Ormel
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Non-alcoholic beverage and caffeine consumption and mortality: the Leisure World Cohort Study.

Authors:  Annlia Paganini-Hill; Claudia H Kawas; María M Corrada
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Association of body mass index and weight change with all-cause mortality in the elderly.

Authors:  María M Corrada; Claudia H Kawas; Farah Mozaffar; Annlia Paganini-Hill
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Efforts to locate low-income women for a study on mammography rescreening: implications for public health practice.

Authors:  Janet Kay Bobo; Jean A Shapiro; Jennifer Brustrom
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2006-06

10.  Smoking and mortality among residents of a California retirement community.

Authors:  A Paganini-Hill; G Hsu
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.