Literature DB >> 8346640

The potential for avermectins to affect wildlife.

D I McCracken1.   

Abstract

Avermectin residues in the dung from treated livestock are detrimental to dung insects. Rare insects could be put at risk by the use of avermectins, especially those which breed exclusively in the dung of the herbivores on which avermectins are used. Livestock dung is an important feeding habitat for a number of vertebrate species. The potential for direct poisoning of vertebrates through the accumulation of avermectins in the body, after consumption of invertebrates containing residues, would, on present knowledge, appear to be limited, but should not be disregarded. The use of avermectins may also indirectly affect some species of vertebrate by depleting the quality and quantity of important food resources. The effects of any reduction in invertebrate food in livestock dung would be expected to be especially severe if it occurred at critical times for the vertebrates, such as during the breeding season or when newly independent young animals were foraging and fending for themselves. Insects that develop in livestock dung therefore have important, additional roles in the ecology of pasture-lands, other than aiding dung degradation processes. It is essential that these other roles are taken into account when any assessment of the environmental consequences of using avermectins in livestock is being made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8346640     DOI: 10.1016/0304-4017(93)90162-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  6 in total

1.  Abamectin effects on rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).

Authors:  Vlasta Jencic; Manica Cerne; Nevenka Kozuh Erzen; Silvestra Kobal; Vesna Cerkvenik-Flajs
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Measurement of predatory behaviour in cow dung-colonising insect larvae, using compound-specific (13)C-tracing of dietary fatty acids.

Authors:  Luke Dickson; Richard P Evershed; Richard Wall
Journal:  J Chem Biol       Date:  2011-07-30

Review 3.  Endectocide use in cattle and fecal residues: environmental effects in Canada.

Authors:  Kevin D Floate
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.310

Review 4.  Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: what are the big questions?

Authors:  Alistair B A Boxall; Murray A Rudd; Bryan W Brooks; Daniel J Caldwell; Kyungho Choi; Silke Hickmann; Elizabeth Innes; Kim Ostapyk; Jane P Staveley; Tim Verslycke; Gerald T Ankley; Karen F Beazley; Scott E Belanger; Jason P Berninger; Pedro Carriquiriborde; Anja Coors; Paul C Deleo; Scott D Dyer; Jon F Ericson; François Gagné; John P Giesy; Todd Gouin; Lars Hallstrom; Maja V Karlsson; D G Joakim Larsson; James M Lazorchak; Frank Mastrocco; Alison McLaughlin; Mark E McMaster; Roger D Meyerhoff; Roberta Moore; Joanne L Parrott; Jason R Snape; Richard Murray-Smith; Mark R Servos; Paul K Sibley; Jürg Oliver Straub; Nora D Szabo; Edward Topp; Gerald R Tetreault; Vance L Trudeau; Glen Van Der Kraak
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Co-infection patterns of intestinal parasites in arboreal primates (proboscis monkeys, Nasalis larvatus) in Borneo.

Authors:  Annette Klaus; Elke Zimmermann; Kathrin Monika Röper; Ute Radespiel; Senthilvel Nathan; Benoit Goossens; Christina Strube
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.674

6.  Adverse effects of routine bovine health treatments containing triclabendazole and synthetic pyrethroids on the abundance of dipteran larvae in bovine faeces.

Authors:  Gillian Gilbert; Fiona S MacGillivray; Helen L Robertson; Nicholas N Jonsson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.