Literature DB >> 8343796

Artificial intelligence in medicine and male infertility.

D J Lamb1, C S Niederberger.   

Abstract

MAIN PROBLEM: fertility data is inadequately assessed by traditional statistical methods for a variety of reasons. First, the principal test of male fertility potential, the Semen Analysis (SA) is a composite of several dissimilar parameters, and the SA and other laboratory tests of fertility potential reflect physiological mechanisms that interact in complex ways. Second, patient data is often fragmented, obtained from multiple sources. Importantly, 2 patients are required for the final result.
METHODS: Novel and powerful computational method, the neural network, was explored to analyze fertility data. An integrated series of programs was written in the C computer language to implement a back propagation algorithm. A model data analysis system was chosen, predicting the penetration of zona-free hamster ova by sperm (Sperm Penetration Assay (SPA)) and the distance travelled by the farthest swimming sperm (Penetrak Assay) from the SA, for these 2 assays are generally believed by the reproductive medical community to be independent of the SA. The classification accuracy of the neural network was compared to 2 standard statistical methods, linear discriminant function analysis (LDFA) and quadratic discriminant function analysis (QDFA).
RESULTS: A neural network could be trained to correctly predict the Penetrak result in over 80% of assays it had not previously encountered, and another network could predict the SPA outcome in nearly 70%. The neural network was superior to LDFA and QDFA in predicting both assay outcomes (for Penetrak: LDFA = 64%, QDFA = 69%; for SPA: LDFA = 65%, QDFA = 45%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8343796     DOI: 10.1007/bf00182040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  60 in total

1.  Potential usefulness of an artificial neural network for differential diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases: pilot study.

Authors:  N Asada; K Doi; H MacMahon; S M Montner; M L Giger; C Abe; Y Wu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Neural network analysis of serial cardiac enzyme data. A clinical application of artificial machine intelligence.

Authors:  J W Furlong; M E Dupuy; J A Heinsimer
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Neural networks for electrical impedance tomography image characterisation.

Authors:  A S Miller; B H Blott; T K Hames
Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas       Date:  1992

4.  Medical logic module (MLM) representation of knowledge in a ventilator treatment advisory system.

Authors:  K Arkad; H Gill; U Ludwigs; N Shahsavar; X M Gao; O Wigertz
Journal:  Int J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1991

5.  A neural network as an approach to clinical diagnosis.

Authors:  B H Mulsant
Journal:  MD Comput       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb

Review 6.  Artificial intelligence in medical diagnosis: the INTERNIST/CADUCEUS approach.

Authors:  G Banks
Journal:  Crit Rev Med Inform       Date:  1986

7.  A comparison of the bovine cervical mucus penetration test and the postcoital test.

Authors:  S Moeslein; H D Taubert
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.775

Review 8.  Radiologic automated diagnosis (RAD).

Authors:  G Banks; J K Vries; S McLinden
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 9.  Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of low back pain.

Authors:  N H Mann; M D Brown
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  A knowledge-based information system for advice in the crisis management of the patient with burns.

Authors:  F Wiener; A Hedlund; T Groth
Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil       Date:  1990 May-Jun
View more
  2 in total

1.  SARS-CoV-2: Has artificial intelligence stood the test of time.

Authors:  Mir Ibrahim Sajid; Shaheer Ahmed; Usama Waqar; Javeria Tariq; Mohsin Chundrigarh; Samira Shabbir Balouch; Sajid Abaidullah
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 6.133

2.  A systematic review of the applications of Expert Systems (ES) and machine learning (ML) in clinical urology.

Authors:  Hesham Salem; Daniele Soria; Jonathan N Lund; Amir Awwad
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.796

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.