| Literature DB >> 36195992 |
Mir Ibrahim Sajid1, Shaheer Ahmed2, Usama Waqar1, Javeria Tariq1, Mohsin Chundrigarh1, Samira Shabbir Balouch3, Sajid Abaidullah4,5.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Artificial intelligence (AI) has proven time and time again to be a game-changer innovation in every walk of life, including medicine. Introduced by Dr. Gunn in 1976 to accurately diagnose acute abdominal pain and list potential differentials, AI has since come a long way. In particular, AI has been aiding in radiological diagnoses with good sensitivity and specificity by using machine learning algorithms. With the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, AI has proven to be more than just a tool to facilitate healthcare workers in decision making and limiting physician-patient contact during the pandemic. It has guided governments and key policymakers in formulating and implementing laws, such as lockdowns and travel restrictions, to curb the spread of this viral disease. This has been made possible by the use of social media to map severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 hotspots, laying the basis of the "smart lockdown" strategy that has been adopted globally. However, these benefits might be accompanied with concerns regarding privacy and unconsented surveillance, necessitating authorities to develop sincere and ethical government-public relations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36195992 PMCID: PMC9521771 DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002058
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Med J (Engl) ISSN: 0366-6999 Impact factor: 6.133
Using of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine.
| Field of medicine | Author | Year | Usage of AI |
| Oncology | Sotoudeh | 20192018201620182019 | |
| Radiology | Pesapane | 20182019 | |
| Cardiology | Krittanawong | 201720132018202020182019 | |
| Neurology | Lee | 201720182018 | |
| Reproductive | Topol | 201920191993 | |
| Ophthalmology | Wong | 201620192016 | |
| Pediatric diseases | Liang | 2019 | A study where retinal fundus photographs were used for diagnosis of age-related macular degeneration showed an accuracy of the algorithm ranging from 88% to 92%, which was comparable to expert clinicians. |
| Congenital diseases | Gurovich | 2018 | |
| Gastroenterology | Topol | 2019 | |
| Dermatology | Fogel | 201820172019 | |
| Mental health | Topol | 2019 | |
| Intensive care unit (ICU) settings | Hanson | 2001 | |
| Precision medicine | Mesko | 2017 | Precision medicine is an approach that utilizes AI algorithms to focus on the treatment and prevention of disease on grounds of genetic and environmental factors. |
Use of artificial intelligence in identifying cases.
| Author(s) | Modality | Sample size | Task | Method | Accuracy |
| Wang | CT | 1065 CT images (325 COVID-19 and 740 viral pneumonia) | Diagnose COVID-19 | Inception transfer-learning | Accuracy: 79.3%Specificity: 83.0%Sensitivity: 67.0% |
| Chen | CT | 106 CT images (51 COVID-19 and 55 others) | Diagnose COVID-19 and others | UNet++ | Accuracy: 92.5%Specificity: 93.6%Sensitivity: 100.0% |
| Jin | CT | 1881 CT images (496 COVID-19 and 1385 others) | Diagnose COVID-19 and others | CNN | Specificity: 95.5%Sensitivity: 94.1% |
| Xu | CT | 618 CT images (219 from 110 COVID-19 patients, 224 from 224 influenza-A viral pneumonia patients, and 175 from healthy people) | Diagnose COVID-19 and influenza-A viral pneumonia | 3D deep learning | Accuracy: 86.7% |
| Shi | CT | 2685 CT images (1658 COVID 19 and 1027 community-acquired pneumonia [CAP]) | Diagnose COVID-19 and CAP | iSARF | Accuracy: 87.9% |
| Zheng | CT | 542 CT images (313 COVID-19 and 229 others) | Diagnose COVID-19 and others | U-Net CNN | Specificity: 91.1%Sensitivity: 90.7% |
| Jin | CT | 1136 CT images (723 COVID-19 and 413 others) | Diagnose COVID-19 and others | UNet++ CNN | Specificity: 92.2%Sensitivity: 97.4% |
| Li | CT | 4356 chest CT exams from 3322 patients | Diagnose COVID-19 and CAP | COVNet | Accuracy: 95.0% |
| Song | CT | 275 CT images (88 COVID-19, 101 bacteria pneumonia, and 86 healthy) | Diagnose COVID-19, and bacterial pneumonia | ResNet-50 | Accuracy: 86.0% |
| Wang | X-ray | 16756 CXR images | Diagnose COVID-19 | COVID-Net | Accuracy: 92.4% |
| Narin | X-ray | 100 CXR images (50 COVID-19 and 50 normal) | Diagnose COVID-19 | ResNet50 InceptionV3 Inception-ResNetV2 | Accuracy: 98.0%Accuracy: 97.0%Accuracy: 87.0% |
| Zhang | X-ray | 1531 CXR images (100 COVID-19 and 1431 other pneumonias) | Diagnose COVID-19 and others | ResNet | Accuracy: 95.2%Specificity: 70.7%Sensitivity: 96% |
| Ardakani | CT | 612 CT images (306 COVID-19 and 306 normal) | Diagnose COVID-19 | CAD | Accuracy: 91.94%Sensitivity: 93.54%Specificity: 90.32%AUC: 0.965 |
| Zhang | X-ray | 5208 CXR images (2060 COVID-19 and 3148 other pneumonias) | Diagnose COVID-19 and others | CV19-Net | Sensitivity: 88%Specificity: 79%AUC: 0.96 |
| Wehbe | X-ray | 2214 CXR images (1192 COVID-19 and 1022 normal) | Diagnose COVID-19 | DeepCOVID-XR | Accuracy: 83%Sensitivity: 75%Specificity: 93%AUC: 0.90 |
| Zhou | CT | 2814 CT images (793 COVID-19 and 2021 viral pneumonia) | Diagnose COVID-19 and viral pneumonia | Trinary scheme | Accuracy: 91.7%Sensitivity: 88.9%Specificity: 94.4%AUC: 0.95 |
CT: Computed tomography; COVID-19: Coronavirus disease 2019; CNN: Convolutional neural networks; CXR: Chest X-ray; AUC: Area under the curve.
Using of artificial intelligence in identifying hotspot.
| Authors | Year | Location | Area captured and Population | Effectiveness |
| Petropoulos | 2020 | China and Austria | Not mentioned Assumption: area of the two countries | The geographical spread of the virus and individual's health are being monitored by AI-powered smartphone applications. Individuals can be notified of potential infection hotspots in real time. AI is not yet playing a significant role in the fight against COVID-19. |
| Dasgupta | 2020 | India | Not mentioned Assumption: area of the entire country | Prediction through social networking data proves to be effective. Tweets with hashtags of “COVID” and “coronavirus” were used to determine hotspots in different Indian states and territories. The results were compatible with the report published by the Indian government. |
| United States of America, United Kingdom, New Zealand | Not mentioned Assumption: area of the entire country | Similarly, Twitter was used with the same hashtags as above to compare the total number of tweets of each country to the total number of confirmed COVID-19 cases (till April 15, 2020). The results showed a correlation (correlation coefficient of 0.995) between the two variables. | ||
| Kreuzhuber | 2020 | (Article in Europe), Assessing global impact | Global | Canadian health monitoring company BlueDot was able to send out a warning to its clients about the COVID-19 outbreak in China and the rest of the world as early as December 31, 2019, in contrast to WHO, which notified the public nine days later.They were also able to predict the most suspected cities and countries that COVID-19 would infect using global air ticket data. The first places affected by COVID-19 were among the top 11 listed countries byBlueDot. |
| Bisanzio | 2020 | Global | Global | Results of this cohort study showed that the spatiotemporal spread of reported COVID-19 cases could be predicted at a global level by analyzing openly available geolocated Twitter social media data. |
| COVID Near You[ | 2020 | US, Canada, Mexico | All three countries.Total No. reported on website: 1,484,109 (US) 595,911 (Canada) 6640 (Mexico) | Developed by Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, COVID-19 Near You is a real-time health reporting website in which users can report their symptoms. It shows patterns and hotspots by locations. Undetermined effectiveness. |
| Lee | 2020 | US | Not mentioned Assumption: area of US | Combines features such as providing a geo-map of countries across America using information from the US CDC, John Hopkins University, and other public sources; shows a real-time Twitter feed of COVID-19 news as well as data about hospitals and other useful information to local users. |
| Jana | 2020 | US and Italy | Not mentioned Assumption: area of both countries | Experiments done on data obtained for the USA and Italy reveal high prediction accuracy with high resolution. |
COVID-19: Coronavirus disease 2019; WHO: World Health Organization; CDC: Center for Disease Control.
Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in aiding healthcare professionals.
| Location | Category | Applications |
| United Kingdom | Doctorlink App[ | Symptoms assessment platform; video consultations (SARS-CoV-2 and other diseases). |
| United States of America | WhatsApp chatbot[ | SARS-CoV-2 information service.Early detection of SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare professionals by tracking their heart rates, temperatures, movements, and sleep patterns. |
| China | UV-light-zapping germicidal robots[ | UV light disinfection. |
| Robots[ | Cleaning; disinfecting; measuring temperature, heart rate, and oxygen saturation; delivering medicine and food; entertaining and comforting patients. | |
| CT scan interpreter | Interpreting CT scan images to identify SARS-CoV-2 when radiologists are unavailable. | |
| Italy | Robot[ | Allowing visual and acoustic patient-doctor communication; measuring blood pressure and oxygen saturation; disinfecting the premises. |
| Denmark | UVD Robots[ | UV light disinfection. |
| Belgium | Robots[ | Speaking 53 languages for communication; scanning QR codes; measuring temperature; determining if face masks are being worn properly. |
| India | Robots[ | Delivering medicine and food; UV light disinfection; registering patients; conducting preliminary screening; directing patients to relevant departments. |
| Tunisia | Robots[ | Measuring heart rate, temperature, and oxygen saturation; allowing virtual communication. |
| Rwanda | Robots[ | Measuring temperature; monitoring patients; delivering medicine and food; identifying people without masks. |
| Multinational | Suki, Kara Voice Assistant Programs[ | Updating medical records automatically (for SARS-CoV-2 and other consultations). |
CT: Computed tomography; QR: Quick response; SARS-CoV-2: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; UV: Ultraviolet.